<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Plant Protection Science</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-4781</Issn>
				<Volume>55</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Pre-harvest interval and residue assessment of emamectin benzoate+lufenuron (Proclim fit® UV) and metaflumizone (Alverd®) insecticides in tomato</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Pre-harvest interval and residue assessment of emamectin benzoate+lufenuron (Proclim fit® UV) and metaflumizone (Alverd®) insecticides in tomato</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>253</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>239</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">102941</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/ijpps.2025.391394.1007075</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Vahideh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mahdavi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Pesticide Research Department, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection (IRIPP),, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Aziz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sheikhigarjan</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Agricultural Entomology, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Taghi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tohidi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Plant Protection, Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center in Kermanshah Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Leila</FirstName>
					<LastName>Faraverdeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Pesticides Research, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nateq Golestan</LastName>
<Affiliation>Plant Protection Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abdoolnabi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bagheri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Plant Protection, Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center in Hormozgan Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-2480-935X</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>30</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Tomatoes are one of the agricultural products that are a priority for monitoring due to their high per capita consumption, fresh and raw consumption, and high pesticide use. Currently, the tomato fruit worm or cotton bollworm &lt;em&gt;Helicoverpa armigera&lt;/em&gt;, with a wide host range, is one of the key pests of tomatoes, which has reduced the marketability of this product, and chemical control of this pest is one of the common methods of managing this pest. In this study, the evaluation of the pre-harvest interval (PHI) was carried out at the optimal doses of each of the studied pesticides. Alverd&lt;sup&gt;@&lt;/sup&gt; 240 SC insecticide at a dose of 1000 ml/ha and Proclaim Fit&lt;sup&gt;@&lt;/sup&gt; UV 500 WG insecticide at a dose of 100 g/ha showed the best efficiency. Therefore, the residue of these pesticides in tomato crops and the evaluation of the proposed Karnes period were carried out at these doses. Based on the results of the insecticide residues of metaflumizone, lufenuron, and emamectin benzoate in tomatoes treated with these pesticides, the 3-day pre-harvest interval of Alvord (metaflumizone) and the 7-day pre-harvest interval of Proclimfit (lufenuron and emamectin benzoate) were investigated and verified. The residue results, compared to the national MRL of these pesticides, showed that the 3-day PHI of metaflumizone and the 7-day PHI of lufenuron and emamectin benzoate in tomatoes were acceptable.&lt;br /&gt;.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Tomatoes are one of the agricultural products that are a priority for monitoring due to their high per capita consumption, fresh and raw consumption, and high pesticide use. Currently, the tomato fruit worm or cotton bollworm &lt;em&gt;Helicoverpa armigera&lt;/em&gt;, with a wide host range, is one of the key pests of tomatoes, which has reduced the marketability of this product, and chemical control of this pest is one of the common methods of managing this pest. In this study, the evaluation of the pre-harvest interval (PHI) was carried out at the optimal doses of each of the studied pesticides. Alverd&lt;sup&gt;@&lt;/sup&gt; 240 SC insecticide at a dose of 1000 ml/ha and Proclaim Fit&lt;sup&gt;@&lt;/sup&gt; UV 500 WG insecticide at a dose of 100 g/ha showed the best efficiency. Therefore, the residue of these pesticides in tomato crops and the evaluation of the proposed Karnes period were carried out at these doses. Based on the results of the insecticide residues of metaflumizone, lufenuron, and emamectin benzoate in tomatoes treated with these pesticides, the 3-day pre-harvest interval of Alvord (metaflumizone) and the 7-day pre-harvest interval of Proclimfit (lufenuron and emamectin benzoate) were investigated and verified. The residue results, compared to the national MRL of these pesticides, showed that the 3-day PHI of metaflumizone and the 7-day PHI of lufenuron and emamectin benzoate in tomatoes were acceptable.&lt;br /&gt;.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">pesticide residue</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pre-harvest interval</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Tomato</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">tomato fruit worm</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ijpps.ut.ac.ir/article_102941_b487d02f3a822a0eb7e86d761e2c2bdf.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
