Plant-Parasitic Nematodes (Nematoda: Tylenchomorpha) Associated with Different Crops in the Damavand Region, with Descriptions of Two New Records for Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran.

2 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

10.22059/ijpps.2025.400520.1007089

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes are among the most important groups of nematodes due to their interactions with plants and their economic consequences for a wide range of crops. Faunistic survies play a crucial role in accurate species identification, forming the foundation for effective management and control strategies. To investigate plant-parasitic nematodes in Damavand County, Tehran Province, 184 soil samples were collected from the rhizosphere of various crops in orchards and fields during 2021-2022. Nematodes were extracted, fixed, and mounted on permanent microscopic slides for morphological and morphometric analysis. A total of 49 species belonging to 23 genera within the infraorder Tylenchomorpha were identified. The nematodes recovered belonged to eight families: Anguinidae, Aphelenchoididae, Criconematidae, Dolichodoridae, Hoplolaimidae, Pratylenchidae, Tylenchidae, and Tylenchulidae. Among these, Tylenchidae was the most widely distributed family, with a frequency of 17.1%. Although they were highly abundant, these nematodes are often considered to have limited direct economic crop damage potential. Among the notable plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs), in the Damavand region, Helicotylenchus vulgaris (6%) and Pratylenchus neglectus (5.4%) were the most prevalent species. Of the identified species, Rotylenchus elegans and Paratylenchus aciculus are reported for the first time in Iran, and their morphological descriptions are provided in this study. The identification of plant-parasitic nematode species in the Damavand region provides valuable baseline information for understanding their distribution and for developing effective management strategies. 

Keywords


Extended Abstract

Introduction

    Agricultural crops worldwide continually face threats from plant pathogens, including fungi, bacteria, viruses and nematodes. Among these, plant-parasitic nematodes—often referred to as the “hidden enemies” of plants—are frequently overlooked by farmers despite their significant impact (Kleynhans, 1996). Effective management of plant-parasitic nematodes requires a thorough understanding of their pathogenic effects on crops, which, in turn, depends on the precise identification of the nematode species. Accurate identification serves as the foundation for assessing nematode population dynamics and developing effective management strategies (‏‏‏‏Seesao et al., 2017). Numerous plant-parasitic nematodes from the infraorder Tylenchomorpha De Ley and Blaxter, 2002, have been reported from various agricultural regions in Iran (Ghaderi et al., 2018).

Several studies have examined nematode fauna in Tehran and Alborz provinces. Mojtahedi et al., (1980) identified 31 species across different genera within the family Tylenchorhynchidae in Iran. Notable species recovered from agricultural and horticultural hosts in these provinces include Merlinius brevidens from Ovin, Quinisulcius acti from Varamin, Tylenchorhynchus clarus from Savojbolagh, Taleqan, and Shahriar, Merlinius grandis from Karaj, M. stegus from Hesark, Shahriar and Savojbolagh and Amplimerlinius socialis from Hashtgerd and Savojbolagh. Additionally, the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus vulnus, a highly damaging species, was also reported from the roots of plane trees (Barooti & Alavi, 2002). Saeedizadeh (2016) identified 28 species from 19 genera of plant-parasitic nematodes in Tehran’s green landscapes, with the genera Filenchus, Criconemoides, Helicotylenchus, Criconema and Pratylenchus exhibiting the highest species diversity.

 

Several other studies have also documented multiple species of plant-parasitic nematodes from different crops and localities whitin provinces (Hojjat Jalali, 1974; Karimipour Fard et al., 2002; Barooti & Khazini, 2008; Salehi, 2009; Lotfi & Gharekhani, 2013). Although the Damavand region covering 11,500 hectares of orchards and farmlands, comprehensive research on plant-parasitic nematode in this area remains limited. Consequently, this study aims to address this gap through morphology-based identification of plant-parasitic nematodes affecting diverse crops across the Damavand region.

 

Materials and Methods

To identify plant-parasitic nematodes in the orchards and fields of the Damavand region, 184 soil and root samples were collected from various rhizosphere soil of the crops during 2021-2022 (Table 1). Nematodes were extracted using the tray method (Whitehead & Hemming, 1965) and the sucrose centrifugation technique. (Jenkins, 1964). For light microscopy, specimens were heat-killed in a 4% formaldehyde solution and cleared with anhydrous glycerin following the De Grisse (1969) method.

Permanent microscope slides were prepared from the extracted nematodes. Measurements were taken with a Nikon E600 light microscope equipped with a drawing tube, and data were recorded and analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel® 2013. Nematode species were identified using standard nematology resources and estabilished identification keys.

The relative frequency of plant-parasitic nematodes was calculated using the formula:

Relative Frequency (%) = (No. of sampling units in which species occur)/ (Total number of sampling units used in the study) *100

soil sample per unit volume= 100 grams dry soil

This provided an estimate of the prevalence of each species within the sampled area.

 

Results and Discussion

Based on morphological and morphometric characteristics, 49 nematode species from 23 genera within the infraorder Tylenchomorpha were identified. The recovered nematodes belong to eight families: Anguinidae, Aphelenchoididae, Criconematidae, Dolichodoridae, Hoplolaimidae, Pratylenchidae, Tylenchidae and Tylenchulidae. Tylenchidae was the most widely distributed family, with a frequency of 17.1%. Despite their high abundance, these nematodes are often considered non-significant due to yield reductions. The recorded frequency percentages for major plant-parasitic nematodes within the families Hoplolaimidae, Pratylenchidae, Dolichodoridae, Criconematidae and Tylenchulidae were 11.4%, 8.7%, 8.7%, 5.4% and 5.4%, respectively.

Among economically important plant-parasitic nematodes, Helicotylenchus vulgaris and Pratylenchus neglectus were the most prevalent nematodes in the Damavand region, occurring in 6.0% and 5.4% of samples, respectively (Table 1). This study provides full descriptions, including morphological and morphometric diagnostic characters, line drawings and photomicrographs, for the two newly recorded species from Iran: Paratylenchus aciculus Brown, 1959 and Rotylenchus elegans (Khan & Khan, 1982) Fortuner, 1987.

Author Contributions

 “Conceptualization, Farnaz Fekrat and Reza Ghaderi ; methodology, Farnaz Fekrat.; software, Farnaz Fekrat.; validation, Farnaz Fekrat and Reza Ghaderi., formal analysis, Farnaz Fekrat.; investigation, Farnaz Fekrat, Reza Ghaderi, Ebrahim Pourjam and Akbar Karegar Bideh; resources, Farnaz Fekrat; data curation, Farnaz Fekrat.; writing—original draft preparation, Farnaz Fekrat.; writing—review and editing, Farnaz Fekrat and Reza Ghaderi.; supervision, Reza Ghaderi.; project administration, Farnaz Fekrat and Reza Ghaderi.; funding acquisition, Shiraz University and University of Jiroft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Shiraz University, Tarbiat Modares University and University of Jiroft for preparing the fund of research and also all participants of the present study.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University. The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

Nematology, Taxonomy.

REFERENCES
Antoniou, M. (1980). Rotylenchus cypriensis sp. n. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) from Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea, 8(2), 137–140.
Barooti, S. & Alavi, A. (2002). Plant Nematology Principles, Parasitic and Quarantine Nematodes in Iran. Tehran, Iran: Applied Agriculture Sciences. (In Persian).
Barooti, Sh. & Khazini, H. (2008). Identification of the fauna of parasitic and predatory nematodes of persimmon trees in Tehran, Shemiran and Karaj. The 18th Iranian Plant Protection Congress. Volume 2 - Plant Diseases (p. 602), Hamedan. (In Persian).
Brown, G. L. (1959). Three new species of the genus Paratylenchus from Canada (Nematoda- Criconematidae). Proceeding of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 26, 1–8.
Brzeski, M. W. & Szczygiel, A. (1963). Studies on the nematodes of the genus Paratylenchus Micoletzky (Nematoda- Paratylenchinae) in Poland. Nematologica, 9(4), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529263X00728.
Brzeski, M. W. (1998). Nematodes of Tylenchina in Poland and temperate Europe. Warszawa, Poland: Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polish Academy of Sciences, 397 p.
Castillo, P., & Vovlas, N. (2005). Bionomics and identification of the genus Rotylenchus (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) (Vol. 3). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Clavero-Camacho, I., Palomares-Rius, J. E., Cantalapiedra-Navarrete, C., Leon-Ropero, G., Martin-Barbarroja, J., Archidona-Yuste, A. & Castillo, P. (2021). Integrative taxonomy reveals hidden cryptic diversity within pin nematodes of the genus Paratylenchus (Nematoda: Tylenchulidae). Plants, 10(7), 1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071454.
Coomans, A. (1962). Morphological observations on Rotylenchus goodeyi Loof & Oostenbrink, 1958. 1. Redescription and variability. Nematologica, 7 (1), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529262X00233.
De Grisse, A. T. (1969). Redescription ou modification de quelques techniques utilisées dans l'étude des nematodes phytoparasitaires. Belgium, Gent: Mededeling Fakulteit Landbouwwetenschappen, 351–369.
De Ley, P., & Blaxter, M. (2002). Systematic position and phylogeny. In D. Lee (Ed.), The biology of nematodes (1st ed., pp. 1–30). London, UK: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/B12614.
Eroshenko, A. S. (1976). Rotylenchus alpinus n. sp. from the mountain tundra of the Kamchatka. Parazitologiya, 10(5), 463–465.
Fortuner, R. (1987). A reappraisal of Tylenchina (Nemata). 8. The family Hoplolaimidae Filip’ev, 1934. Revue Nématol, 10, 219–232.
Geraert, E., & Barooti, S. (1996). Four Rotylenchus from Iran, with a key to species. Nematologica, 42, 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1163/004625996X00018.
Ghaderi, R., Geraert, E., & Karegar, A. (2016). The Tylenchulidae of the world- Identification of the family Tylenchulidae (Nematoda: Tylenchida). Gent, Belgium: Academia Press.
Ghaderi, R., Kashi, L., & Karegar, A. (2014). Contribution to the study of the genus Paratylenchus Micoletzky, 1922 sensu lato (Nematoda: Tylenchulidae). Zootaxa, 3841(2), 151–187. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3841.2.1.
Ghaderi, R., Kashi, L., & Karegar, A. (2018). Plant-parasitic nematodes in Iran. Tehran, Iran: Marjae-e-Elm and Iranian Society of Nematology. (In Persian).
Hojjat Jalali, A. (1974). Morphology and taxonomy of Tylenchida nematodes in Karaj orchards. [Master's thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran]. (In Persian).
Jairajpuri, M.S., & Siddiqi, M.R. (1979). Observations on the nematode genera Orientylus and Calvatylus (Rotylenchoidinae: Hoplolaimidae) with descriptions of three new species. Indian Journal of Nematology, 7(2), 101–111.
Jenkins, W. R. B. (1964). A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Disease Reporter, 48(9).
Kankina, V. K. & Teben'kova, T. M. (1980). Nematodes from the family Hoplolaimidae (Filipjev, 1934) Wieser, 1953 on grapevine in Tadzhikistan. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk Tadzhikskoi SSR (Ahboroti Akademijai Fanhoi RSS Tocikiston), Biologicheskie Nauki, 1(78), 33–40. (In Russian).
Karimipour Fard, H., Kheiri, A., & Barooti, S. (2002). Identification of the nematodes of order Tylenchida, associated with important field crops in Tehran province. In Proceedings of 15th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, p. 308. (In Persian).
Khan, M. L., & Khan, S. H. (1982). Three new species of genus Orientylus Jairajpuri & Siddiqi, 1977 associated with fruit trees in India (Rotylenchoidinae: Nematoda). Indian Journal of Nematology, 12(1), 111–117.
Kleynhans, C. J. (1996). A qualitative procedure for the assessment of the habitat integrity status of the Luvuvhu River (Limpopo system, South Africa). Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 5(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF00691728.
Lotfi, Z., & Gharekhani, A. (2013). Introduction of several nematode species from the infraorder Tylenchomorpha from Qom province. Plant Diseases, 49(4), 389–401. (In Persian).
Mohilal, N., & Dhanachand, C. (2004). Two new species of paratylenchidae from Manipur. Journal of Zoology, 24(2), 173–177.
Mojtahedi, H., Sturhan, D., Akhiani, A., & Barooti, S. (1980). Xiphinema species in Iranian vineyards. Nematologia Mediterranea, 8, 165–170.
Raski, D. J. (1976). Revision of the genus Paratylenchus Micoletzky, 1922 and descriptions of new species. Part III of three parts-Gracilacus. Journal of Nematology, 8, 97–115.
Saeedizadeh, A. (2016). Identification and distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in landscape of Tehran City, Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant Protection Science, 47(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijpps.2016.59288.
Salehi, F. (2009). Identification of Nematodes of the Order Tylenchida from Some medicinal plant farms in Tehran and Golestan Provinces. [Master's Thesis, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources]. (In Persian).
Seesao, Y., Gay, M., Merlin, S., Viscogliosi, E., Aliouat-Denis, C. M., & Audebert, C. (‏‏‏‏2017). A review of methods for nematode identification. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 138, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.05.030.
Shahina, F. & Maqbool, M. A. (1993). Gracilacus musae n. sp., (Nematoda: Paratylenchinae) from banana field in Sindh, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Nematology, 11, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-079.
Siddiqi, M.R. (1986). Tylenchida: Parasites of plants and insects. (pp. 645). Wallingford, Oxon, UK: Commonwealth Institute of Parasitology, CAB.
Van den Berg, E., & Quénéhervé, P. (1999). New records of Paratylenchus species from Guadeloupe, French West Indies (Paratylenchinae: Nemata). Journal of Nematode Morphology and Systematics, 2(1), 35–43.
Van den Berg, E. (1989). More species of pin nematodes from southern Africa (Paratylenchinae: Nemata). Phytophylactica, 21, 221–226. https://doi.org/10.10520/AJA03701263_1257.
Whitehead, A. G., & Hemming, J. R. (1965). A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Annals of Applied Biology, 55(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1965.tb07864.x.