Antibacterial potential of Lucilia sericata larval secretions and extracts against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Isfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran

2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological ciences, Falavarjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Falavarjan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Siavash Diabetes Clinic, Affiliated with Zist Eltiam Sepanta Knowledge-Based Company, Isfahan, Iran

10.22059/ijpps.2026.410134.1007111

Abstract

The rising resistance of bacteria to common antibiotics has underscored the urgent need to discover and develop novel antibacterial agents. One promising natural source in this regard is the secretions and extracts of Lucilia sericata larvae, which have gained attention in recent years due to their antimicrobial properties and wound-healing potential. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the antibacterial effects of the secretions and extracts derived from L. sericata larvae against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli using standard microbiological methods. In this study, larval secretions and extracts were obtained from three-day-old larvae using different solvents (70% ethanol and a mixture of methanol: water: acetic acid). The antibacterial activity of the samples was assessed using well diffusion, disk diffusion, and colony counting methods against standard strains of S. aureus and E. coli. The results indicated that larval secretions alone exhibited no significant antibacterial activity. However, the extracts from dried larvae using 70% ethanol and the mixed solvent (methanol: water: acetic acid) showed considerable inhibitory effects against pathogenic bacteria. The largest inhibition zone diameter was observed with the extract prepared using the mixed solvent. Furthermore, concentrating the extracts with Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) enhanced their efficacy. This study demonstrates that L. sericata larval extracts, especially when combined with suitable solvents, possess notable potential for inhibiting pathogenic bacteria. These extracts may serve as a complementary or alternative approach in treating infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Keywords


Extended Abstract

Introduction

The overuse of antibiotics has led to a global crisis of bacterial drug resistance, complicating infection treatment, increasing costs, and reducing drug efficacy. The World Health Organization considers this a major threat to public health. In this context, biological products from Lucilia sericata larvae, of the Calliphoridae family, have emerged as a promising alternative. Maggot therapy, an FDA-approved method, is used for debriding chronic wounds and accelerating tissue repair. The secretions and extracts of these larvae contain enzymes, antimicrobial peptides, and bactericidal compounds that disrupt bacterial membranes, inhibit enzymes, and create an unfavorable environment for pathogens. These compounds can also degrade bacterial biofilms and prevent resistant colony formation. Studies demonstrate their effectiveness against resistant strains like MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, though research on dried or frozen larval extracts and solvent comparisons is limited. Standardizing extraction methods and identifying active compounds are critical for broader clinical applications. Thus, this study aimed to prepare L. sericata secretions and extracts using multiple solvents (70% ethanol and mixed solvent including methanol: water: acetic acid mixture) and evaluate their efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli using three standard microbial methods (well plate, disk diffusion, and colony count). The study also investigated the role of DMSO in enhancing the antibacterial performance of these extracts to provide a comprehensive view of their therapeutic potential.

 

Materials and Methods

Three-day-old L. sericata larvae were reared and prepared under sterile conditions with strict hygiene protocols. For secretion preparation, live larvae were incubated in phosphate buffer saline (PBS), and the filtered secretion fluid was tested. For extract preparation, dried larvae were homogenized with two solvents: 70% ethanol and a mixture of methanol: water, acetic acid mixture (90:9:1 ratio). The resulting extracts were centrifuged, filtered, and concentrated for use. Antibacterial activity was assessed using three standard methods: well plate, disk diffusion, and colony count. Two standard strains, including S. aureus ATCC 25923 and E. coli ATCC 25922 strains were used as target bacteria. Negative controls included pure solvents (without extracts).

 

Results

The results showed that the dried larval extract with mixed solvent (DL9) exhibited the highest antibacterial activity across all tests, including well plate, disk diffusion, and colony count. In the disk diffusion method, DL9 produced inhibition zones of 22 mm against S. aureus and 16 mm against E. coli. In the colony count method, a 10-fold reduction in S. aureus colonies and a remarkable 1000-fold reduction in E. coli colonies were recorded after 24 hours of exposure to DL9, indicating significant bacteriostatic properties. Additionally, the 70% ethanol extract (DLE), while less effective than DL9, produced a 17 mm inhibition zone against S. aureus and a 10-fold reduction in bacterial count. The addition of DMSO significantly enhanced the efficacy of both extracts, particularly the ethanol extract, which showed a greater reduction in microbial load with DMSO.

 

Discussion

This study highlights the significant potential of L. sericata larval extracts, particularly in dried form and extracted with suitable solvents, for inhibiting pathogenic bacterial growth. The observed inhibitory effects against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, especially S. aureus, support the potential use of these extracts as disinfectants or adjuncts to antibiotic therapies in clinical settings. The results emphasize the importance of solvent selection in extracting bioactive compounds and the effectiveness of concentration methods like DMSO in enhancing their activity. These extracts could serve as alternatives to traditional antibiotics for treating drug-resistant infections. Moreover, optimizing the extraction process could lead to standardized biological products for therapeutic applications.

 

Conclusion

Consistent with previous studies, our findings confirm the antibacterial activity of maggot secretions and extracts. Limitations include the focus on only two bacterial species and the lack of molecular analyses to identify active compounds. Future research should explore a broader range of pathogens, cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and the potential for loading extracts into nanocarriers.

Author contribution

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Data availability

The data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Plant Protection Department of University of Kurdistan. We thank university of Kurdistan for providing research facility and support.

Ethical consideration

The study was conducted on plant-pathogen fungus and beneficial entophy-

tic bacteria that are abundant in the environment and do not require ethical

approva

The study was conducted on plant-pathogen fungus and beneficial entophytic fungi that are abundant in the environment and do not require ethical approval.

 

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

 

REFERENCES
Barnes, K. M., Gennard, D. E., & Dixon, R. A. (2010). An assessment of the antibacterial activity in larval excretion/secretion of four species of insects recorded in association with corpses, using Lucilia sericata Meigen as the marker species. Bulletin of entomological research, 100(6), 635-640.doi.org/10.1017/S000748530999071X
Bazaliński, D., Kózka, M., Karnas, M., & Więch, P. (2019). Effectiveness of chronic wound debridement with the use of larvae of Lucilia sericata. Journal of clinical medicine, 8(11), 1845.
Cabirol, A., & Haase, A. (2019). The neurophysiological bases of the impact of neonicotinoid pesticides on the behaviour of honeybees. Insects, 10(10), 344.
Daeschlein, G., Mumcuoglu, K., Assadian, O., Hoffmeister, B., & Kramer, A. (2007). In vitro antibacterial activity of Lucilia sericata maggot secretions. Skin pharmacology and physiology, 20(2), 112-115.
Ehteshaminia, Y., Mohammadi, H., Mahdavi, S. A., & Rahimi, M. (2020). A Review on maggot therapy by Lucilia sericata larvae on infectious wounds. Tabari Biomedical Student Research Journal.
Gandy, S. L., Hansford, K. M., & Medlock, J. M. (2023). Possible expansion of Ixodes ricinus in the United Kingdom identified through the Tick Surveillance Scheme between 2013 and 2020. Medical and veterinary entomology, 37(1), 96-104.
Gazi, U., Taylan‐Ozkan, A., & Mumcuoglu, K. Y. (2021). The effect of Lucilia sericata larval excretion/secretion (ES) products on cellular responses in wound healing. Medical and veterinary entomology, 35(3), 257-266.
Jiang, X., Kong, X., Wang, X., Yu, Z., Guo, X., Jin, M., . . . Wei, L. (2023). Oroxylin a glucuronide as a novel class of reversible inhibitors of Sortase a, combats MRSA-induced infections. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 134(5), lxad089.
Kehrli, P., Monnier, J., Vonlanthen, O., Cara, C., Jelmini, L., Steiner, T., . . . Linder, C. (2022). Optimization of the sampling method to monitor Drosophila suzukii infestation in vineyards. Journal of Applied Entomology, 146(4), 408-414.
Meylears, K., Cerstiaens, A., Vierstraete, E., Baggerman, G., Michiels, C., De Loof, A., & Schoofs, L. (2002). Antimicrobial compounds of low molecular mass are constitutively present in insects: characterisation of β-alanyl-tyrosine. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 8, 99-110.
Milne, J., Searle, R., & Styche, T. (2020). The characteristics and impact of hard-to-heal wounds: results of a standardised survey. Journal of wound care, 29(5), 282-288.
Nezakati, E., Hasani, M. H., Zolfaghari, P., Rashidan, M., & Sohrabi, M. B. (2020). Effects of Lucilia sericata maggot therapy in chronic wound treatment: A randomized clinical trial. Chronic Wound Care Management and Research, 11-17.
Puttaswamy, S., Gupta, S. K., Regunath, H., Smith, L. P., & Sengupta, S. (2018). A comprehensive review of the present and future antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) systems. Arch Clin Microbiol, 9(3).
Shariatinia, A., Zandi, M., Sanjabi, M. R., & Ghaedrahmati, A. (2024). Antibacterial Potential of Lucilia Sericata excretions/secretions in bovine cutaneous wounds. Microbiology, Metabolites and Biotechnology, 7(1), 48-56.
Sig, A. K., Koru, O., & Araz, E. (2018). Investigation of whole body extract metabolites of Lucilia sericata larvae and potential antibacterial effects. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, 9(3), 191-198.
Singh, N., Pattnaik, D., Neogi, D. K., Jena, J., & Mallick, B. (2016). Prevalence of ESBL in Escherichia coli isolates among ICU patients in a tertiary care hospital. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR, 10(9), DC19.
Tahmasebi, M., Soleimanifard, S., Sanei, A., Karimy, A., & Abtahi, S. M. (2020). A survey on inhibitory effect of whole-body extraction and secretions of Lucilia sericata's Larvae on Leishmania major In vitro. Advanced Biomedical Research, 9(1), 12.
Wagner, G. E., Berner, A., Lipp, M., Kohler, C., Assig, K., Lichtenegger, S., . . . Gad, A.-M. (2023). Protein microarray-guided development of a highly sensitive and specific dipstick assay for glanders serodiagnostics. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 61(1), e01234-01222.
Yan, L., Chu, J., Li, M., Wang, X., Zong, J., Zhang, X., . . . Wang, S. (2018). Pharmacological properties of the medical maggot: a novel therapy overview. Evidence‐Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2018(1), 4934890.
Yang, L., Rong, G.-C., & Wu, Q.-N. (2022). Diabetic foot ulcer: challenges and future. World journal of diabetes, 13(12), 1014.