Evaluation of some soybean lines to soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) under control conditions and field

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Plant Pathology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

2 Department of Nematology, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

3 Tekato Complex, Oilseeds Improvement Company

4 Department of Plant Protection, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

The soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycine Ichinohe, SCN) is one of the most serious yields limiting pathogen on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr) which is found in many soybean–growing regions throughout the world. Applying of resistant sources is one of the efficient measures to manage this nematode. In this study, reaction of 63 soybean lines to the soybean cyst nematode were evaluated in field and growth chamber conditions. Host resistance was determined on the basis of female index (i.e., number of female developed on the tested lines / number of female on the standard susceptible cultivar Lee 74 as percentage). The results demonstrated that five lines were defined as resistant, whereas 14 lines with FI 10 to 29 were considered as moderate resistance. Subsequently, 22 lines were demonstrated as moderately susceptible and 22 lines were characterized as susceptible lines. The lines which showed resistance and moderate resistance in field conditions were selected for assay under control conditions. The results of pot experiments conducted under control conditions verified the field findings.

Keywords

References

  1. Anand, S.C., Cook, R. & Dale, M.F.B. (1998). Development of resistant and tolerant varieties. In: S. B. Sharma, (ed) The cyst nematodes (pp. 293-321.) Kluwer Academic Publishers
  2. Bradley, E.B. & Duffy, M. (1982). The value of plant resistance to soybean cyst nematodes: A case study of Forrest soybeans. NRS staff report. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
  3. Brim, C. & Ross, J.P. (1966). Registration of Pickett soybeans. Crop Science, 6, 305.
  4. Dunn, R.A. (1969). Extraction of cysts of Heterodera species from soils by centrifugation in high density solutions. Journal of Nematology, 1, 7.
  5. Epps, J.M., Young, L.D. & Hartwig, E.E. (1981). Evaluation of nematicides and resistant cultivar for control of soybean cyst nematode race 4. Plant Disease, 65, 665-666.
  6. Hamblen, M.L., Slack, D.A. & Riggs, R.D. (1972). Temperature effects on penetration and reproduction of soybean cyst nematode. Phytopathology, 62, 762. (Abstr.)
  7. Hartwig, E.E. & Epps, J.M. (1968). Dyer soybeans. Crop Science, 8, 402.
  8. Heydari, R., Pourjam, E., Tanha Maafi, Z. & Safaie, N. (2008). Evaluation of some common soybean cultivars to the major type of soybean cyst nematode of Iran, Heterodera glycines HG Type 0. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology, 44, 319-329. (In Farsi)
  9. Hershman, D.E., Heinz, R.D. & Kennedy, B.S. (2008). Soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, populations adapting to resistant soybean cultivars in Kentucky. Plant Disease, 92(10), 1475-1475.
  10. Heydari, R., Pourjam, E., Tanha Maafi, Z. & Safaie, N. (2010). Comparative host suitability of common bean cultivars to the soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, in Iran. Nematology, 12(3), 335-341.
  11. Heydari, R., Pourjam, E. & Tanha maafi, Z. (2012). Yield loss caused by soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, in Iran. Nematology, 14(5), 589-593.
  12. Leudders, V. D. (1989). Variable transfer of soybean genes for resistance to soybean cyst nematode. Crop Science 29, 933-936.
  13. MacGuidwin, A.E., Grau, C.R. & Oplinger, E.S. (1995). Impact of planting ‘Bell,’ a soybean cultivar resistant to Heterodera glycines, in Wisconsin. Journal of Nematology, 27, 78-85.
  14. Mitchum, M.G., Wrather, J.A., Heinz, R.D., Shannon, J.G. & Danekas, G. (2007). Variability in distribution and virulence phenotypes of Heterodera glycines in Missouri during 2005. Plant Disease, 91, 1473-1476.
  15. Niblack, T.L., Colgrove, A.L., Colgrove, K. & Bond, J.P. (2008). Shift in virulence of soybean cyst nematode is associated with use of resistance from PI 88788. Plant Health Progress, doi:10.1094/PHP-2008-0118-01-RS.
  16. Riggs, R.D. & Schmitt, D.P. (1991). Optimization of the Heterodera glycines race test procedure. Journal of Nematology, 23, 149-154.
  17. Riggs, R. D., Schmitt, D. P. & Noel, G. R. (1988). Variability in race tests with Heterodera glycines. Journal of Nematology, 20, 565-572.
  18. Ross, J. P. &Brim, C. A. (1957). Resistance of soybeans to the soybean cyst nematode as determined by a double-row method. Plant Disease Reporter, 41, 923-924.
  19. Schmitt, D. P. & Shannon, G. (1992). Differentiating soybean responses to Heterodera glycines races. Crop Science, 32(1), 275-277.
  20. Sikora, E.J. & Noel, G.R. (1991). Distribution of Heterodera glycines races in Illinois. Journal of Nematology, 23(4S), 624.
  21. Starr, J.L. & Roberts, P.A. (2004). Resistance to plant-parasitic nematodes. ]n:Z. X. Chen, S.Y. Chen, & D.W. Dickson, )eds) Nematology Advances and Perspectives: Vol. II Nematode Management and Utilization. )p. 879–907.) Oxfordshire, UK, CAB International.
  22. Tanha Maafi, Z., Salati, M. & Riggs, R.D. (2008). Distribution, population density, race and type determination of soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, in Iran. Nematology, 10, 919-924.
  23. Wrather, J.A., Anand, S.C. & Koening, S. R. (2002). Management by cultural practices. In: R. D. Riggs and J. A. Wrather (eds), Biology and management of the soybean cyst nematode. (125-132.) St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society.
  24. Young, L.D. & Hartwig, E.E. (1992). Evaluation of soybeans resistant to Heterodera glycines race 5 for yield and nematode reproduction. Journal of Nematology, 20 (Suppl.), 38-40.
  25. Young, L.D., Hartwig, E.E., Anand, S.C. & Widick, D. (1986). Responses of soybeans and soybean cyst nematodes to cropping sequences. Plant Disease, 70(8), 787-791.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 November 2015
  • Revise Date: 05 June 2016
  • Accept Date: 01 August 2016

Share

How to cite

Statistics