Investigating on control of tomato fruitworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hbn.) by integrating chemical insecticides and the parasitoid wasp Habrobracon hebetor (Say) in field conditions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Plant Protection, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

2 Department of Plant Protection, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

3 Iranian Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In this study, the efficacy of pyridalyl and chromafenozide insecticides and the parasitoid Habrobracon hebetor alone and in combination with insecticides against the tomato fruitworm Helicoverpa armigera in tomato farms in Fars Province were investigated. Chromafenozide + parasitoid and pyridalyl + parasitoid treatments controlled the pest population better when compared to the application of each insecticide or parasitoid alone, which indicates the increasing effect of insecticide and parasitoid when used together. The highest healthy green fruit yield was observed in pyridalyl treatment, the highest healthy red fruit yield, and the highest total yield was observed in chromafenozide + parasitoid and pyridalyl + parasitoid treatments and the lowest was observed in the control. Also, the lowest amount of damaged green fruit, red damaged fruit, and red rotten tomato was observed in chromafenozide + parasitoid and pyridalyl + parasitoid treatments. The highest amount of damage was observed in the control treatment. In addition, the highest increase in total yield was observed in the treatments of chromafenozide + parasitoid and pyridalyl + parasitoid treatments, and the lowest was observed in the parasitoid alone treatment. The integrated treatments had the highest efficiency, the least damaged fruit, the highest yield, and the highest increase in yield. This study showed that pyridalyl and chromafenozide insecticides in combination with H. hebetor are a suitable method for controlling H. armigera in tomato fields.

Keywords


Extended Abstract

Introduction

Extensive application of insecticides has caused the phenomenon of insecticide resistance in tomato fruit worm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hbn.). To prevent the development of this process, scientists believe the frequency of insecticide application against this pest should be reduced. One of the methods to reduce the use of insecticides is to integrate them with biological control agents. In this study, the feasibility of controlling the tomato fruit worm in field conditions using an integrated pest management method with the use of two selective insecticides, pyridalyl, and chromafenozide, along with the most important and widely used biological control agent, Habrobracon hebetor (Say) has been studied.

 

 

 

Materials and Methods

To evaluate the effectiveness of the mentioned insecticides and parasitoids on the pest in field conditions, an experiment was designed in the form of a randomized complete block design in six treatments with three replications. This experiment was carried out in two tomato farms in the Kooshk area of ​​Marvdasht City in Fars province in 2019. To conduct field experiments, two fields were selected at a distance of more than 1200 meters in the Kooshk area to minimize the possibility of movement through its flight. The tested treatments include H. hebetor parasitoid, pyridalyl + parasitoid, chromafenozide + parasitoid, pyridalyl, chromafenozide, and control. The first three treatments were done in the separated farm and the next three treatments were done in the other farm. The number of the released parasitoid was 2500 per hectare (2000 female insects and 500 male insects) and the application of pyridalyl and chromafenozide insecticides was done as recommended field concentration, 150 ml. and 1.5 l. per hectare respectively.

 

Results and Discussion

The highest efficiency percentage was observed in the treatments of chromafenozide + parasitoid and pyridalyl + parasitoid and the lowest of this parameter was observed in the treatment of parasitoid. The highest amount of damaged tomato fruit was observed in the control treatment, and among the tested treatments, chromafenozide + parasitoid and pyridalyl + parasitoid treatments caused the greatest decrease in this parameter, and parasitoid treatment caused the least decrease in this parameter. The highest healthy green fruit yield was observed in the pyridalyl treatment, the highest healthy red fruit yield and the highest total yield were observed in the chromafenozide + parasitoid and pyridalyl + parasitoid treatments, and the lowest of these parameters was observed in the control treatment. Also, the lowest yield of damaged green fruit, red damaged fruit, and red shriveled fruit was observed in the treatments of chromafenozide + parasitoid and pyridalyl + parasitoid, and the highest of these parameters was observed in the control treatment. In addition, the highest increase in total yield was observed in the treatments of chromafenozide + parasitoid and pyridalyl + parasitoid, and the lowest of this parameter was observed in the treatment of parasitoid.

 

Conclusion

This study showed that combined treatments (pyridalyl + parasitoid, and chromafenozide + parasitoid) compared to single treatments (insecticides or parasitoid) had more effects on tomato fruitworm larvae so that by killing most of the larvae, the population of the pest has been reduced and, in this way, the tomato fruits have been protected from the damage of the larvae so that it has increased the yield. This study proved that the combination of pyridalyl insecticide or chromafenozide with the parasitoid wasp H. hebetor will be more successful in controlling the tomato fruit worm than the use of the insecticide or the parasitoid alone, and as a result, the use of pyridalyl or chromafenozide insecticides along with the parasitoid H. hebetor in the integrated management program of H. armigera is feasible.

Amir-maafi, M. and Chi, H. 2006. Demography of Habrobracon hebetor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on two pyralid hosts (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Annals of Entomological Society of America. 99(1): 84–90.
Bagheri, A.N., Askari Seyahooei, M., Fathipour, Y., Famil, M., Koohpayma1, F., Mohammadi-Rad, A. and Parichehreh, Sh. 2019. Ecofriendly managing of Helicoverpa armigera in tomato field by releasing Trichogramma evanescence and Habrobracon hebetor. Journal of Crop Protection. 8 (1): 11-19.
Biondi, A., Desneux, N., Amiens-Desneux, E., Siscaro, G., and Zappala, L. 2013. Biology and developmental strategies of the palaearctic parasitoid Bracon nigricans (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on the Neotropical moth Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 106: 1638–1647.
Biondi, A., Mommaerts, V., Smagghe, G., Vinuela, E., Zappala, L. and Desneux, N. 2012. The non-target impact of spinosyns on beneficial arthropods. Pest Management Science. 68: 1523–1536.
Croft, B. A. 1990. Factors affecting susceptibility In: Arthropod biological control agents and pesticides (Ed. Croft, B.A.). Wiley and Sons Publication. Pp 71–100.
Darwish Mojeni, T. Bayat Asadi, H., Noori Ganbalani, G. Shojaei, M. 2005.  Study on bioregional aspects of bollworm ,Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in the cotton fields of Golestan Province.  Journal of Agricultural Sciences Islamic Azad University of Iran 11 (2), 97-115. (In Persian)
Eliopoulos, P.A. and Stathas, G.J. 2008. Life tables of Habrobracon hebetor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasitizing Anagasta kuehniella and Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): effect of host density. Journal of Economic Entomology. 101: 982–988.
Farrow, R.A. and Daly, J.C. 1987. Long range movements as an adaptive strategy in the genus Heliothis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): An overview of its occurrence and detection in four pest species. Australian Journal of Zoology. 35: 1–24.
Filho, M. M., Vilela, E. F., Attygalle, A. B., Meinwald, J., Svatoš, A., and Jham, G. N. 2000. Field trapping of tomato moth, Tuta absoluta with pheromone traps. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 26, 875-881.
Fitt, G.P. 1989. The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems. Annual of Review Entomology. 34: 17–52.
Hagstrum, D.W. and Smittle, B.J. 1978. Host utilization by Bracon hebetor. Environmental Entomology. 7:596–600.
Hassan, S.A. 1994. Activities of the IOBC/WPRS working group pesticides and beneficial organisms. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 17: 1–5.
Henderson, C.F. and Tilton, E.w. 1955. Tests with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. Journal of Economic Entomology. 48: 157–161.
Hussain, D., Ali, H., Qasim, M. and Khan, J. 2015. Insecticidal susceptibility and effectiveness of Trichogramma chilonis as parasitoids of tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera. Pakistan Journal of Zoolology. 47(5): 1427–1432.
IRAC. 2020. IRAC Mode of Action Classification Scheme. Version 9.4, IRAC International MoA Working Group, Insecticide Resistance Action Committee, 1–30 pp. Retrieved October 28, 2021. From http://www.irac-online.org.
Khankani, M. 2012. Field crop pests in Iran (Insects & Mites). Bu-Ali Sina University Press, 719 pp. (In Persian)
Lawo, N.C., Mahon, R.J., Milner, R.J., Sarmah, B.K., Higgins, T.J.V. and Romeis, J. 2008. Effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis-transgenic chickpeas and the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae in controlling Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Applied and Environmental Microbiology.74: 4381–4389.
Magro, S.R., Dias, B.A., Terra, W. R. and Parra, J.R.P. 2006. Biological, nutritional and histochemical basis for improving an artificial diet for the parasitoid wasp Bracon hebetor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Neotropical Entomology. 35:725–730.
Mahla, M.K., Lekha, Singh, V., Swami, H. and Choudhary, R.S. 2017. Efficacy of different insecticides against pest complex of tomato and effect on their natural enemies. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 5(5): 229–234.
Mardani A.,  Sabahi, Q. Sheikhi-Garjan A. 2021. Lethal and sub-lethal effects of insecticides chromafenozide, pyridalyl and thiodicarb on parasitoid wasp, Habrobracon hebetor. Plant Pest Research 10: 1-14.
 McCaffery, A.R., Ahmad, M., Walker, C.H., Gladwell, R.T. and Lee, K.S. 1986. Studies on resistance to insecticides in the cotton bollworm, Heliothis armigera with special reference to the pyrethroids. Proceeding of the British Crop Protection Conference on Pests and Diseases, Brighton, England. Pp 591.
Mosallanejad, H. and Gholami, Z. 2019. First report of thiodicarb resistance of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in Iran. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran 39: 195-212. (In Persian)
Nishimura, Sh. Saito, Sh. and Isayama. Sh. 2017. Pyridalyt: A novel compound with excellent insecticidal activity, high Selectivity, and unique mode of action. Japanese Journal of Plant Science. 1(2): 85–94.
Oluwafemi, A.R., Rao, Q., Wang, X.Q. and Zhang, H.Y. 2009. Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis on Habrobracon hebetor during combined biological control of Plodia interpunctella. Insect Science. 16: 409–416.
Patra, S. and Samanta, A. 2017. Toxicity of some new and conventional insecticides on Trichogramma chilonis Ishii and Bracon brevicornis Wesmael under laboratory condition. Journal of Environmental Biology. DOI :http://doi.org/10.22438/jeb38/5/    MRN-410.
Pineda, S., Martinez, A.M., Figueroa, J.I., Schneider, M.I., Estal, P.D. 2009. Influence of Azadirachtin and Methoxyfenozide on life parameters of Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 102(4):1490–1496.
Qeshm, R. A. and Kafi, M. 2006 . Industrial tomatoes from planting to harvesting. Jihad-e-Daneshgahi Mashhad, 86pp. (In Persian)
Rani, G., Gupta, N., Redhu, N.S. and Kumar, S. 2018. Ecdysone receptor present in insects is a novel target for insecticide. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7(5): 1548–1553. 
Reed, W. 1965. Heliothis armigera (Hubner.) (Noctuidae) in Western Tanganyika. 1. Biology with special reference to the pupal stage. II. Ecology and natural and chemical control. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 56: 117–125.
Saber, M. and Abedi, Z. 2013. Effects of methoxyfenozide and pyridalyl on the larval ectoparasitoid Habrobracon hebetor. Journal of Pest Science. 86: 685–693.
Sakamoto, N., Saito, S., Hirose, T., Suzuki, M., Matsyo, S., Izumi, K., Nagatomi, T., Ikegami, H., Umeda, K., Tsushima, K. and Matsuo, N. 2004. The discovery of pyridalyl; a novel insecticidal agent for controlling lepidopterous pests. Pest Management Science. 60: 25–34.
Sedaratian, A. 2012 Sublethal effects of Bacillus thuringiensis on eco-physiological parameters of Helicoverpa armigera and Habrobracon hebetor. PhD Thesis, Tarbiat  Modares University. 160pp. (in Persian)
Sheikhigarjan, A. Najafi, H., Abbasi,S., Azimi,H. and Moradi M. 2021. The chemical and organic pesticide guide of Iran  Rah Dan  press, Tehran,Iran,p.525.
Stark, J.D., Banks, J.E., and Acheampong, S. 2004. Estimating susceptibility of biological control agents to pesticides: influence of life history strategies and population structure. Biological Control. 29: 392–398.
Taylor, A.D. 1988. Host effect on functional and ovipositional response of Bracon hebetor. Journal of Animal Ecology. 57: 173–184.
Zalucki, M.P. and Jallow, M.F.A. 2003. Relationship between oviposition preference and offspring performance in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Australian Journal of Entomology. 42: 343–348.