مقایسه کارایی جلب کننده‌های مختلف در شکار مگس جالیز Dacus ciliatus (Diptera: Tephritidae) در شهر کرمانشاه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی


1 گروه گیاه‌پزشکی، دانشکده مهندسی کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 دانشگاه رازی هیئت علمی

3 استادیار، گروه گیاه‌پزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران

4 دانشیار، گروه گیاه‌پزشکی، دانشکده مهندسی کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران


مگس جالیز،Dacus ciliatus ، یکی از مهمترین آفات گیاهان جالیزی است که لارو با تغذیه از میوه آن را غیر قابل استفاده می‌کند. اثر جلب‌کنندگی ملاس چغندرقند، پروتئین هیدرولیزات، استات آمونیوم، سرکه سیب، مخمر جو (با غلظت پنج درصد)، محرک غذایی آمونیا و فرومون جنسی مگس جالیز، با استفاده از تله مکفیل در یک مزرعه خیار در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با چهار تکرار در سال 1397 بررسی شد. تله‌ها روی پایه‌های چوبی به ارتفاع یک متر آویزان شده و حشرات شکار شده هفتگی شمارش شدند. نتایج نشان داد که ملاس چغندرقند، پروتئین هیدرولیزات، مخمر جو، استات آمونیوم، فرومون مگس جالیز، سرکه سیب و محرک غذایی آمونیا به ترتیب در جلب حشرات بالغ بیشترین تاثیر را داشتند. بالاترین میزان شکار حشرات غیر هدف از راسته‌های Diptera، Lepidoptera، Hymenoptera، Coleoptera و Thysanoptera در تیمار مخمر جو مشاهده شد. کمترین میزان شکار حشرات غیر هدف در تیمارهای، فرومون مگس جالیز (15/0 ± 98/0)، محرک غذایی آمونیا (17/0 ± 03/1) و استات آمونیوم (25/0 ± 17/1) دیده شد اما تفاوت معنی‌دار آماری بین این تیمارها وجود نداشت. نوسانات جمعیت حشرات بالغ مگس جالیز در تیمارها و تاریخ‌های مختلف نمونه برداری الگوی متفاوتی را نشان داد. بیشترین و کمترین فراوانی جمعیت در ماه‌های مهر و تیر با میانگین شکار هفتگی 3/36 و 5/0 مگس بالغ ثبت شد. بطور کلی ملاس چغندرقند، پروتئین هیدرولیزات و مخمر جو با غلظت پنج درصد به عنوان تیمارهایی با کارایی بالاتر و اقتصادی برای جلب و کنترل مگس جالیز در مزرعه خیار پیشنهاد می‌شوند.


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparative field study of various attractants of the pumpkin fruit fly, Dacus ciliatus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Kermanshah

نویسندگان [English]

  • masoumeh paydar 1
  • Naser Moeini-Naghadeh 2
  • Farzad Jalilian 3
  • Abbas Ali Zamani 4
1 plant protection department, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Razi, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Razi, Kermanshah, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Plant Protection Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, IRAN
4 Associate Professor, Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Razi, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده [English]

Pumpkin fly, Dacus ciliatus, is one of the most important pests of cucurbitaceous plants which the larva by feeding on fruit. make it unusable. Effect of sugar beet molasses, hydrolyzed protein, ammonium acetate solution, apple vinegar, beer yeast (5%), ammonia lure and Dacus pheromone to determine the best attractant by using the Mcphail trap was conducted in a 3ha cucumber field by using a completely randomized design with four replications in 2018. Traps hang on wooden stands (1 m) and checked weekly and captured insects were recorded. Results revealed that Pumpkin flies captured with Sugar beet molasses, hydrolyzed protein, beer yeast, ammonium acetate solution, Dacus pheromone, apple vinegar and ammonia lure were effective in attracting adult insects, respectively. The highest weekly captured of non-target insects such as Diptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera were observed in Beer yeast. The lowest weekly captured of non-target insects were observed in Dacus pheromone (0.98 ± 0.15), ammonia lure (1.03 ± 0.17) and ammonium acetate (1.17 ± 0.25), but there is no significant differences among these treatments statistically. Adult population fluctuations did not follow the same patterns in different treatments and sampling dates. The highest and lowest populations were observed in October and July with records of 36.3 and 0.5 flies. Both sexes were active in field and the sex ratio was 0.63 female and 0.37 male. In conclusion, sugar beet molasses, hydrolyzed protein and beer yeast are very efficient and economic attractants to entrap pumpkin flies in cucumber fields.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dacus ciliatus
  • Cucurbitaceous crops
  • Bait-spray
  • Mass trapping
  1. Aldawood, A.S. (2013). Comparative study of Cucurbit fly: Dacus ciliatus Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae) infestation on Zucchini squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) at Huraimila and Diraab, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. Biological Sciences 6(2), 91-96.
  2. Arghand, B. (1983 .(Introduction flies Dacus sp. and study it in the province Hormozgan. Plant Pests and Diseases, 51(1), 3-9.
  3. Broumas, T., Haniotakis, G., Liaropoulos, C., Tomazou, T. & Ragoussis, N. (2002). The efficacy of an improved form of the mass‐trapping method, forthe control of the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin)(Dipt., Tephritidae): pilot‐scale feasibility studies. Applied Entomology, 126(5), 217-223.
  4. Duan, J.J. & Prokopy, R.J. (1995). Control of apple maggot flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) with pesticide-treated red spheres. Economic Entomology, 88(3), 700-707.
  5. El-Sayed, A., Suckling, D., Wearing, C. & Byers, J. (2006). Potential of mass trapping for long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. Economic Entomology, 99(5), 1550-1564.
  6. Haniotakis, G.E. (2005). Olive pest control: present status and prospects. IOBC wprs Bulletin 28(9), 1.
  7. Harris, E., Nakagawa, S. & Urago, T. (1971). Sticky traps for detection and survey of three tephritids. Economic Entomology, 64(1), 62-65.
  8. I A E A. (2003). Trapping guidelines for area-wide fruit fly programmes. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, p. 47.
  9. IAEA. (2007). Development of improved attractants and their integration into fruit fly SIT Management Programmes. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, p. 230.

10. Javadzadeh, M. & Jemsi, G. (1998). Preliminary study of cucurbits fly Dacus ciliatus. Agricultural ResearchCenter of Khuzestan, p. 20.

11. Leblanc, L., Vargas, R.I. and Rubinoff, D.J.E.e. (2010). Captures of pest fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and nontarget insects in BioLure and torula yeast traps in Hawaii. 39(5), 1626-1630.

12. McPhail, M. (1939). Protein lures for fruit flies. Economic Entomology, 32(6), 758-761.

13. McQuate, G.T., Jones, G.D. & Sylva, C.D. (2003). Assessment of corn pollen as a food source for two tephritid fruit fly species. Environmental Entomology, 32(1), 141-150.

14. Messing R. (1999). Managing Fruit Flies on Farms in Hawaii. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, furtherance of Cooperative Extension work.

15. Nishida, T. (1980). Food system of tephritid fruit flies in Hawaii. Proceedings, Hawaiian Entomological Society, 23, 245–254.

16. Papadopoulos, N.T., Katsoyannos, B.I., Kouloussis, N.A., Hendrichs, J., Carey, J.R. & Heath, R.R. (2001). Early detection and population monitoring of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a mixed-fruit orchard in northern Greece. Economic Entomology, 94(4), 971-978.

17. Parchami Araghi, M. (1996). Introduction of Dacus (Didacus) ciliatus Loew (Diptera, Tephritidae) as Cucurbit fly in Iran, Proceedings of the 12th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, p. 160.

18. Pezhman, H. (1996). Survey of Biology and Distribution Areas of cucurbitacin fly in Hormozgan Province. Iranian Research Institute of plant protection, p. 11.

19. Pezhman, H., Ostovan, H., Kamali, K. & Rezaei, V. (2011). Evaluation of various traps and attractants for trapping the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), in a mixed-fruit orchard in Shiraz (Fars province). Applied Entomology & Phytopathology, 78, 217-236.

20. Pezhman, H. (2016). Comparison of various protein hydrolesates for mass trapping of Ceratitis capitata (Weidmen) (Dip: Tephritidae) in a pomegranate orchard in Shiraz region, Plant Pest Research, 61-70.

21. Steiner, L.F., Miyashita, D.H. & Christenson, L.D. (1957). Angelica oils as Mediterranean fruit fly lures. Economic Entomology, 50(4), 505.

22. Tan, K.H., Nishida, R., Jang, E.B. & Shelly, T.E. (2014). Pheromones, male lures, and trapping of tephritid fruit flies.Trapping and thedetection, control, and regulation of tephritid fruit flies, 15-74.

23. Vargas, R.I., Prokopy, R.J., Duan, J.J., Albrecht, C. & Li, Q.X. (1997). Captures of wild Mediterranean and oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Jackson and McPhail traps baited with coffee juice. Economic Entomology, 90(1), 165-169.

24. Vargas, R.I., Mau, R.F., Jang, E.B., Faust, R.M., Wong, L., Koul, O., Cuperus, G. & Elliott, N. (2008). The Hawaii fruit fly areawide pest management programme. from: http://www.digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub.

25. Vargas, R.I., Souder, S.K., Rendon, P. & Mackey, B. (2017). Suppression of Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) With Trimedlure and Biolure Dispensers in Coffea arabica (Gentianales: Rubiaceae) in Hawaii. Economic Entomology, 111(1), 293-297.

26. Zandi, N. & Shishehbor, P. (2013). Study of the population dynamics of cucumber fly, Dacus ciliatus Loew (Diptera, Tephritidae) on Autumnal cucumber of Mollasani region of Khuzestan province. Plant Protection, 27, 258-262.