c3518cb17d976b8

کنترل زیستی بیماری پاخوره گندم با استفاده از دو قارچ اندوفیت Penicillium canescens و Penicillium hordei

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه گیاهپزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

2 گروه علوم زیستی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

10.22059/ijpps.2026.409466.1007101

چکیده

در این تحقیق، دو جدایه قارچ اندوفیت Ag1T5 و TB4L1 بترتیب از Aegilops triuncialis وTriticum boeoticum جداسازی گردید. بر اساس خصوصیات ریخت شناسی و توالی ناحیه کالمودولین (CaM) این دو جدایه به عنوان Penicillium canescens  و Penicillium hordei  شناسایی شدند. هر دو جدایه P. canescens و P. hordei رشد پرگنه قارچ بیمارگر را در روش کشت متقابل بترتیب به میزان 65/52 و 69/70 درصد کاهش دادند. همچنین ترکیبات غیر فرار (فیلتر شده) P. canescens و P. hordei رشد پرگنه قارچ بیمارگر را بترتیب به میزان 11/38 و 44/29 درصد کاهش دادند. برعکس، ترکیبات فرار این دو جدایه قارچ اندوفیت تاثیر قابل توجهی روی رشد پرگنه قارچ بیمارگر نداشتند (33/10 و 07/2 درصد). هر دو جدایه ترکیبات ضد قارچی مثل کتیناز، سلولاز، سیدروفور، پروتیناز و پکتیناز تولید کردند. هر دو جدایه قادر به تولید سیانید هیدروژن نبودند و توانایی حلالیت فسفات را نیز نداشتند. علاوه بر این، هر دو جدایه اندوفیت قارچی هورمون اکسین (57/1 تا 09/2 میکروگرم در میلی­لیتر) و جیبرلین (85/28 تا 91/29 میکروگرم در میلی­لیتر) تولید کردند که روی بهبود شاخص‌های رشد گیاه گندم تاثیر داشتند. شدت بیماری پاخوره گندم در شرایط گلخانه توسط دو جدایه P. canescens و P. hordei بترتیب به میزان 57/83 و 74/38 درصد کاهش یافت. هر دو جدایه قارچ  اندوفیت انتخابی شدت بیماره پاخوره گندم را کاهش و شاخص‌های رشدی گندم را بصورت معنی­داری افزایش دادند. بنابراین،  جدایه P. canescens Ag1T5 به عتوان یک جایگزین خوب ممکن است در دفاع از گیاه گندم در مقابل بیماری پاخوره گندم در شرایط مزرعه موثر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Biological control of Take-all disease of wheat using two fungal endophytes, Penicillium canescens and Penicillium hordei

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masumeh gholami 1
  • Jahanshir Amini 1
  • Jafar abdollahzadeh 1
  • Morahem Ashengroph 2
1 Department of plant protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this study, two endophytic fungi isolate Ag1T5 and TB4L1 were isolated from Aegilops triuncialis and Triticum boeoticum, respectively. They were identified as Penicillium canescens Ag1T5 and Penicillium hordei TB4L1 based on phenotypic characteristics and molecular phylogenetic analysis of the calmodulin gene (Cam) sequences. Then, their abilities as potential biological control agents (BCAs) against Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (Ggt) were evaluated in vitro and greenhouse conditions. In dual-culture method assay, isolates P. canescens Ag1T5 and P. hordei TB4L1 reduced Ggt growth by 52.65% and 70.69%, respectively. Antifungal effects of culture filtrates were observed for P. canescens with 38.11% inhibition, followed by the P. hordei (29.44%). Unlike, the volatile metabolites of selected endophytic fungi had low effect on growth of Ggt in vitro (2.07 to 10.33%). Fungal endophytes produced antifungal metabolites such as chitinase, cellulase, siderophore, protease and pectinase. Both isolates did not produce HCN and they were not able to phosphate solubilization. Furthermore, both isolates produced auxin (1.57-2.09 µg/mL) and gibberellin hormones (28.85-29.91 µg/mL), which significantly enhanced growth parameters of wheat plants. Disease severity of take-all were reduced by Ag1T5 with 83.57%, followed by TB4L1 (38.74%) in greenhouse conditions. In conclusion, both selected endophytic fungi were reduced disease severity of wheat take-all disease and were improved growth parameters of wheat plant under greenhouse conditions. Moreover, P. canescens Ag1T5 is good candidate, which might be useful in protection of wheat plant against take-all disease under field conditions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Calmodulin gene
  • disease severity
  • greenhouse
  • Ggt
  • Wheat Take-all

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici Walker (Ggt) cause wheat take-all disease and it is the most important disease of wheat and other temperate small-grain cereal such as barley and rye (Cook., 1994; Yu et al., 2009; Cook, 2003). The pathogen survives parasitically in the roots during the growing season and saprophytically on plant debris after crop harvest (Bailey et al., 1999). The pathogen damages cereal plants by rotting the root, crown, and base of the stems and the disease can spread through different ways such as soil, diseased plants, and plant debris ((Asher and Shipton, 1981). Management of the disease by current methods such as crop rotation, use of chemical fungicides, resistant varieties, tillage to hasten infected residue decomposition has been reported to be ineffective (Ghahfarokhy et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2009). Biocontrol of wheat take-all disease by means of different microorganisms could be used as an effective and sustainable approach to control take-all disease of wheat (Lirong Yang et al., 2015; Youn-Sig Kwak et al., 2012) and the use of biocontrol agents (BCAs) to management of wheat take-all can be a more efficient and environmentally friendly alternative (Lirong Yang et al., 2015). For example, Gholami et al. (2019) found that soil drenches of Coprinopsis urticicola and Rhizoctonia endophytica decreased disease severity of wheat take-all comparable to fungicide application, and Sari et al. (2006) used a seed soaking treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens to control wheat take-all in the greenhouse and field conditions. The aim of this research using two endophyte isolates for their ability to suppress Ggt causing take-all disease of wheat in vitro and greenhouse conditions.

 

Materials and Methods

The pathogen Ggt was obtained from the collection of plant pathology department, university of Kurdistan (GenBank accession number: MH488732). Two fungal endophytes were isolated from healthy cereal plants and were identified under a microscope (Olympus BX51) based on the morphology (colonies, mycelia and spores) and molecular phylogenetic analysis. Pathogenicity test of Ggt was demonstrated on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds of cultivars Pishtaz susceptible to take-all disease. Antagonistic abilities of fungal endophytes against the pathogen were investigated through in vitro assays (dual culture, volatile metabolite and non-volatile metabolite) and greenhouse conditions in a completely randomized design with four replications. For greenhouse tests, pathogen and fungal endophytes inocula were prepared on sterilized wheat seed and incubated for 4 weeks. The wheat cultivars Pishtaz susceptible to wheat take-all disease was planted in sterilized soil -sand-peat mix (1:1:1, w/w/w) inoculated with pathogen (20 g/kg soil, in each pot) and endophytes (40 g/kg soil in each pot) in greenhouse conditions. After 35 days, the disease severity and growth parameters of the wheat plant were evaluated (Weller and Cook, 1983). Data were statistically analyzed by standard analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS software (Version 8.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 2013). Differences among different treatments were analyzed using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at P≤0.05. Data were reported as mean values ± standard error (SE).

 

Results and Discussion

Two fungal endophytes were identified as Penicillium canescens Ag1T5 and Penicillium hordei TB4L1 based on phenotypic characteristics and molecular phylogenetic analysis of the calmodulin gene (Cam) sequences. The results of this research showed that two endophytes were highly capable of inhibition the mycelial colony growth of Ggt with inhibition 52.65-70.69% and 29.44-38.11% respectively by dual culture and non-volatile metabolite assays as compared to untreated control treatments after 7 days of inoculation, while volatile of P. canescens and P. hordei had no significant inhibitory effect on Ggt. The fungal endophytes such as Fomes fomentarius and Coprinopsis urticicola showed in vitro antifungal activity against Ggt by dual culture assay on PDA medium with 39.1% and 43.6% inhibition, respectively. Two fungal endophytes produced antifungal metabolites including chitinase, cellulase, siderophore, protease and pectinase. Furthermore, both isolates produced IAA and gibberellin, which had the most effect on increasing of growth parameters of wheat plant (Gholami et al., 2019). Isolate of C. urticicola suppressed the mycelia growth and caused change in morphology of Ggt so that it may be correlated with production metabolites or lytic enzymes such as protease and pectinase that caused abnormalities hyphae morphology (Gholami et al., 2019). In greenhouse conditions, both endophytes P. canescens and P. hordei were reduced disease severity 83.57% and 38.74% respectively. Furthermore, both fungal endophytes improved plant growth parameters of wheat plant. Several biocontrol agents such as of Bacillus subtilis (Lirong Yang et al., 2015; Lirong Yang et al., 2018), Pseudomonas fluorescens (Youn-Sig Kwak et al., 2012; Mohamed and Grossmann, 1994), Streptomyces, Microbispora and Nocardioides (Justin et al., 2004) were evaluated to control wheat take-all disease and reduced disease severity of disease. Also, C. urticicola M2 and Rhizoctonia zeae M32 effectively reduced wilt disease and increased the plant growth parameters of wheat plant in greenhouse conditions (P ≤0.05) in comparison with the inoculated control (Gholami et al., 2019).

 

 

Conclusion

The results of this research indicated P. canescens Ag1T5 had a great potential as biocontrol agent against take-all of wheat caused by Ggt in vitro and greenhouse conditions. In addition, P. canescens Ag1T5 was improved wheat plant growth in greenhouse conditions and it can be used as a safe and suitable alternative to chemical fungicides and could be a useful biocontrol agents BCA) for take-all management.

 

Author Contributions

 MG and JA conceptualized the project. MG and JA performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. JA and MA edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

 

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the authors.

 

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Plant Protection Department of the University of Kurdistan (Grant No: 96/19/32668).

 

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

 

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES
Agrawal, T., & Kotasthane, A.S. (2012). Chitinolytic assay of indigenous Trichoderma isolates collected from different geographical locations of Chhattisgarh in Central India. Springerplus, 1 (1), 73. http://www.springerplus.com/content/1/1/73
Ahmadzadeh, M., & Sharifi Tehrani, A. (2009). Evaluation of fluorescent Pseudomonas for plant growth promotion, antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani on common bean, and biocontrol potential. Biological Control, 48, 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.10.012
Alijani, Z., Amini, J., Ashengroph, M., & Bahramnejad, B. (2019). Antifungal activity of volatile compounds produced by Staphylococcus sciuri strain MarR44 and its potential for the biocontrol of Colletotrichum nymphaeae causal agent strawberry anthracnose. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 307, 108276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108276
Alijani, Z., Amini, J., Ashengroph, M., & Bahramnejad, B. (2021). Microbial detoxification of toxin and antifungal activity of several endophytic bacterial strains against Colletotrichum nymphaeae causal agent of strawberry anthracnose. Biological control, 164, 104776, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104776
Alijani, Z., Amini, J., Karimi, K., & Ilaria, P. (2022). Characterization of the mechanism of action of serratia rubidaea Mar61-01 against Botrytis cinerea in strawberries. Plants, 12, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010154
Alstrom, S., & Burns, R.G. (1989). Cyanide production by rhizobacteria as a possible mechanism of plant growth inhibition. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 7, 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00709654
Arnol, A.E., Mejia, L.C., Kyllo, D., Rojas, E.I., Maynard, Z., Robbins, N., & Herre, E.A. (2003). Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 15649-15654. DOI:10.1073/pnas.2533483100
Asher, M.J.C., & Shipton, P.J. (1981). Biology and Control of Take-all. Academic Press. London, UK. ISBN 10: 0120653206 / ISBN 13: 9780120653201
Barka, E. A., Gogies, S., Nowak, J., Audran, J.C., & Belarbi, A. (2002). Inhibitory effect of endophyte bacteria on Botrytis cinerea and its influence to promote the grapevine growth. Biological control, 24, 135-142. DOI:10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00034-8
Bailey, D.J., & Gilligan, C.A. (1999). Dynamics and primary and secondary infection in take-all epidemics. Phytopathology, 89, 84-91. DOI: 10.1094/phyto.1999.89.1.84
Bithell, S.L., Butler, R.C., Haeeow, S., McKay, A., & Cromey, M.G. (2011). Susceptibility to take-all of cereal and grass species, and their effects on pathogen inoculum. Annals Applied Biology, 159, 252-266. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00493.x.
Busby, P.E., Ridout, M., & Newcombe, G. (2016). Fungal endophytes modifiers of plant disease. Plant Molecular and Biology, 90, 645-655. DOI: 0.1007/s11103-015-0412-0
Carrol, C. (1988). Fungal endophytes in stems and leaves-from latent pathogen to mutualistic symbiont. Ecology, 69, 2-9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943154
Cheong, S.L., Cheow, Y.L., & Ting, A.S.Y. (2017). Characterizing antagonistic activities and host compatibility (via simple endophyte-calli test) of endophytes as biocontrol agents of Canoderma boninense. Biological control, 105, 86-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.12.002
Cook, R.J. (1994). Problems and progress in the biological control of wheat take-all. Plant pathology, 43, 429-437. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1994.tb01576.x 
Cook, R.J. (2003). Take-all of wheat. Review. Physiology and Molecular Plant pathology, 62, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-5765(03)00042-0
Cook, R., & Naiki, T. (1982). Virulence of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici from fields under short-term and long-term wheat cultivation in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A. Plant pathology, 31, 201-207. doi:10.1094/ PHYTO-99-5-0472
Coombs, J.T., Michelsen, P.P., & Franco, C.M. (2004). Evaluation of endophytic actinobacteria as antagonists of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in wheat. Biological Control. 29, 359–366. DOI:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2003.08.001
Dennis, C., & Webster, J. (1971). Antagonistic properties of species groups of Trichoderma II. Production of volatile antibiotics. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 57, 363-369.
Deshmukh, S.K., Dufossé, L., Chhipa, H., Saxena, S., Mahajan, G.B. & Gupta, M.K. (2022). Endophytes: a potential source of antibacterial compounds. Journal of Fungi, 8, 164. DOI: 10.3390/jof8020164
Duffy, B.K., & Weller, D.M. (1995). Use of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici alone and in combination with fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. To suppress take-all of wheat. Plant Disease, 79, 907-911. DOI:10.1094/PD-79-0907
Elsherif, M., & Grossmann, F. (1994). Comparative investigation on the antagonistic activity of fluorescent pseudomonads against Gaeumannomyxes graminis var. tritici in vitro and in vivo. Microbiology Research, 149 (4), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0944-5013(11)80084-4
Eziashi, E.L., Uma, N.U., Adekunle, A.A., & Ariede, C.E. (2006). Effect of metabolites produced by Trichoderma species against Ceratocystis paradoxa in culture medium. Africa Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 703–706. DOI: 10.4314/AJB.V519.42775
Frisvad, J.C. & Samson, R.A. (2004). Polyphasic taxonomy of Penicillium subgenus Penicillium. A guide to identification of food and air-borne terverticillate Penicillia and their mycotoxins. Studies in Mycology, 49: 1–174.
Gao, F.K., Dai, C.C., & Liu, X.Z. (2001). Mechanisms of fungal endophytes in plant protection against pathogens. Africa Journal of Microbiology Research, 4, 1346-1351.
Ghahfarokhy, M.R., Goltapeh, E.M., Purjam, E., Pakdaman, B.S., Modarres Sanavy, S.A.M., & Varma, A. (2011). Potential of mycorrhiza-like fungi and Trichoderma species in biocontrol of Take-all disease of wheat under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Technology, 7 (1), 185–195.
Gholami, M., Amini, J., Abdollahzadeh., & Ashengroph, M. (2019). Basidiomycetes fungi as biocontrol agents against take-all disease of wheat. Biological control, 130, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.12.012
González-Lamothe, R., El Oirdi, M., Brisson, N., & Bouarab, K. (2012) The conjugated auxin indole-3-acetic acid–aspartic acid promotes plant disease development. Plant Cell, 24,762–777.
Gour, A.C. (1990). Physiological functions of phosphate solubilizing micro-organisms. In: Gour, A. C. (ed.) Phosphate solubilizing micro-organisms as biofertilizers. Omega scientific publishers. New Delhi, 16-72.
Guo, Z., Hua, R., Bai, Y., Wu, X., Cao, H., Li, X., Wu, X., & Tang, J. (2011). Screening and evaluation of antiphytopathogenic activity of endophytic fungi from live foliages of Ginkgo biloba L. African journal of microbiology research, 13, 1686–1690.
Gutteridge, R.J., Bateman, G.I., & Todd, A.D. (2003). Variation in the effects of take-all disease on grain yield and quality of winter cereals in field experiments. Pest Management science, 59, 215-224.
Haas, D., & Defago, G. (2005). Biological control of soil-borne pathology by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 56, 1-13.
Haggag, W.M., Kansoh, A.L., & Aly, A.M. (2006). Proteases from Talaromyces flavus and Trichoderma harzianum: Purification, characterization and antifungal activity against brown spot disease on faba bean. Plant Pathology. Bulletin. 15, 231–239.
Hamid, N.B., Ben salem., & Hamid, M.M. (2018). Evaluation of the efficiency of Trichoderma, Penicillium, and Aspergillus species as biological control agents against four soil-born fungi of melon and watermelon. Egyptian journal of biological control, 28, 25. Doi:10.1186/s41938-017-0010-3
Huang, R., Li, G.Q., Zhang, J., Yang, L., Che, H.J., Jiang, D., & Huang, H.C. (2011). Control of postharvest Botrytis fruit rot of strawberry by volatile organic compound of Candida intermedia. Phytopathology, 101, 859–869.
Huang, H.C., & Erickson, R.S., 2008. Factors affecting biological control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by fungal antagonists. Journal of Phytopathology, 156, 628–634.
Hong, S.B., Cho, H.S., Shin, H.D., Frisvad, J.C., & Samson, R.A. (2006). Novel Neosartorya species isolated from soil in Korea. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 56(2): 477-486.
Justin, T.C., Philip, P.M., & Christopherm M.M.F. (2004). Evaluation of endophytic actinobacteria as antagonists of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in wheat. Biological control, 29, 359-366.
Karimi, K., Babai Ahari, A., Arzanlou, M., Amini, J., & Pertot, I. (2017). Comparison of in digamous Trichoderma spp. strains to a foreign commercial strain in terms of bio control efficacy against Colletotrichum nymphaeae and related biological features. Journal of Plant Disease and Protectection, 124, 453–466.
Kasana, R.C., Salwan, R., Dhar, H., Dutt, S. & Gulati, A. (2008). A rapid and easy method for the detection of microbial cellulases on agar plates using gram’s iodine. Current Microbiology, 57, 503–507.
Khan, S.A., Hamayun, M., Yoon, H., Kim, H.Y., Suh, S.J., Hwang, S.K., Kim, J.M., Lee, I. J., Choo, Y.S., & Yoon, U.H. (2008). Plant growth promotion and Penicillium citrinum. BMC Microbiology, 8, 231.
Khezri, M. (2017). Biological control of wheat take-all disease using some biofilm-forming Bacillus subtilis strains. Journal of biocontrol in plant protection, 1, 15-30. doi. 0.22092/bcpp.2017.116039 (In Persian)
Kianivafa, S., Bazgir, E & Darvisnia, M. (2021). Biological control of wheat take-all disease using Trichoderma harzianum and T. viride. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Protection, 10(3), 93-107. Doi.10.22034/arpp.2021.13305 (In persian)
Kraus Kraus J., & Loper, J.E. (1990). Biocontrol of Pythium damping off by Pseudomonas fluorescens pf-5: Mechanistic studies. In Keel C., Kadler B. & Defago G. Plant growth promoting rhizobacter. The second workshop on plant growth promoting rizobacteria. Inter Laken, Switzerland, 172-175.
Larran, S., Perello, A., Simon, M.R., & Moreno, V. (2007). The endophytic fungi from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 23, 565–572.
Leong, D.U., & Gutterson, N. (1988). Characterization of antibiotic biosynthesis locus of Pseudomonas fluorescent strain HV37A.  Phytopathology, 78, 1535.
Lirong Y., Xin Q., Baogue X., Paul, H. G., Shubing, L., Jinhui, W., Du, W., & Chao, W. (2015). Isolation and identification of Bacillus subtilis strain YB-05 and its antifungal substances showing antagonism against Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Biological control, 85, 52-58.
Little, T.M., & Hills, F.J. (1978). Agricultural Experimentation Design and Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 350 pp.
Lirong, Y., Xiaoyun, H., Fan, Z., Paul, H.G., Yanyan, Y., Jia, L., & et al. (2018). Screening Bacillus species as biological control agents of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici on wheat.  Biological control, 118, 1-9.
Liu, B., Qiao, H., Huang, L., Buchenauer, H., Han, Q., Kang, Z., & Gong, Y. (2009). Biological control of take-all in wheat by endophytic Bacillus subtilis E1R-j and potential mode of action. Biological Control, 49 (3), 277–285.
Malinowski, D.P., Zuo, H., Beleski, D.P., & Alloush, G.A. (2004). Evidence for copper binding by extracellular root exudates of tall fescue but not parental ryegrass infected with Neoryphodium spp. Endophytes. Plant soil, 267, 1-12.
Mendez, I., Fallard, A., Soto, I., Tortella, G., De La, M., & et al. (2021). Efficient Biocontrol of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in Wheat: Using Bacteria Isolated from Suppressive Soils. Agronomy, 11, 2008. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/agronomy11102008
Mohamadpoor, M., Amini, J., Ashengroph, M., & Azizi, A. (2022). Evaluation of biocontrol potential of Achromobacter xylosoxidans strain CTA8689 against common bean root rot. Physiological and Molecular Payhology, 117, 101769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2022.101769  
Mohamed, E., & Grossmann, F. (1994). Comparative investigations on the antagonistic activity of fluorescent pseudomonads against Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in vitro and in vivo. Microbiology research, 149, 371-377.
Nilsson, H.E., & Smith, J.D. (1981). Take-all of grasses. In: Asher, M.J.C., Shipton, P.J. (Eds.), Biology and control of Take-all. Academic Press, London, pp. 433-448.
Patten, C.L. & Glick, B.R. (2002). Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 3795-3801.
Petrini, O. (1991). Fungal endophytes of tree leaves. In: Microbial Ecology of Leaves. Springer-Verlag. New York, p. 497.
Raeder, J., & Broda, P. (1985). Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 1, 17-20.
Rojo, F.G., Reynoso, M.M., Ferez, S., Chulze, S.N., & Torres, A.M. (2007). Biological control by Trichoderma species of Fusarium solani causing peanut brown root rot under field conditions. Crop Protection, 26 (4), 549–555.
Samain, E., Van Tuineu, D., Jeandet, Ph., Aussenac, Th., Selim, S. (2017). The plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus sp. strain B2 stimulates wheat defense mechanism against septoria leaf blotch and root colonization by Curtobacterium plantarum. Biological Control, 114, 87–96.
Sanssene, J., Selim, S., Roisin-Fichter, C., Djerroud, L., Deweerb, C., Halam, P. (2011). Protective and curative efficacy of prothioconazole against isolates of Mycosphaerella graminicola differing in vitro sensitivity to DMI fungicides. Pest Managment Science, 67 (9), 1134–1140.
Sattary, M., Amini, J., & Hallaj, R. (2020). Antifungal activity of the lemongrass and clove oil encapsulated in mesoporous silica nanoparticles against wheat’s take-all disease. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 170: 104696. http:// doi.org/1001016/j.pestbp.2020.104696
Selim, S., Roisin-Fichter, C., Andry, J.B., Bogdanow, B., Sambou, R. (2014). Real-time PCR to study the effect of timing and persistence of fungicide application and wheat varietal resistance on Mycosphaerella graminicola and its sterol 14α-demethylation inhibitor-resistant genotypes. Pest Management Sciemce, 70 (1), 60–90.
Seri, E., Etebarian, H.R., Roustaei, A., & Aminian, H. (2006). Biological control of Gaeumanomyces graminis var. tritici on wheat with some isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescent. Pakistan Journal of Biology sciences, 9(7), 1205-1211.
Schiegel, M., Dubach, V., Buol, L.V., & Sieber, T.N. (2016). Effects of endophytic fungi on the ash dieback pathogen. FEMS Microbiology and Ecology, 92(1), 142-150.
Schwyn, Schwyn, B., & Neilands, J.B. (1987). Universal chemical assay for the detection and de termination of siderophores. Analytical Biochemistry, 160 (1), 47–56.
Singh, N., Pandey., Dubet, R.C., & Matheshwari, D.K. (2008). Biological control of root rot fungus Macrophomina phaseolina anf growth enhancement of Pinus roxburghii (Sarg.) by rhizosphere competent Bacillus subtilis BN1. World journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24(9), 1669-1679.
Stein, T. (2005). Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: Structures, syntheses and specific functions. Molecular and Microbiology, 56(4), 845-857.
Sun, W., Shahrajabian, M.H., & Guan, L. (2025). The biocontrol and growth-promoting potential of Penicillium spp. and Trichoderma spp. in sustainable agriculture. Plants, 14, 2007. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132007 
Sunitha, V.H., Devi, D.N., & Srinivas, C. (2013). Extracellular enzymatic activity of endophytic fungal strains isolated from medicinal plants. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9 (1), 1–9.
Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4.0 Beta 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
Swarthout, D., Harper, E., Judd, S., Gonthier, D., Shyne, R., Stowe, T., & Bultman, I. (2009). Measure of leaf-level water-use efficiency in drought stressed endophyte infected and non-infected tall fescue grasses. Environ. Exp. Bot, 66, 88-93.
Ting, Ting, A.S.Y., Mah, S.W., & Tee, C. S. (2010). Identification of Volatile Metabolites from Fungal Endophytes with Biocontrol Potential towards Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Race 4. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 5: 177-182.
Uthandi, Uthandi, S., Karthikeyan, S. & Sabarinathan, K.G. (2010). Gibberellic acid production by Fusarium fuzikoroi SG2. Journal of scientific and industrial research, 69, 211-214.
Vega, F.E., Posada, F., Aime, M.C., Pava-Ripoll, M., Infante, F., & Rehner, S.A. (2008). Entomopathogenic fungal endophytes. Biological control, 46, 72-82.
Visagie, C.M., Houbraken, J., Frisvad, J.C., et al. (2014). Identification and nomenclature of the genus Penicillium. Studies in Mycology, 78(1), 343-471. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014/09.001
Waqas, M., Khan, A. L., Kamran, M., Hamayun, M., Kang, S.M., Kim, Y.H. & Lee, I.J. (2012). Endophytic fungi produce gibberellins and indoleacetic acid and promotes host-plant growth during stress. Molecules, 17 (9): 10754–10773.
 Weller, D.M., & Cook, R.J. (1983). Suppression of take-all of wheat by seed treatments with fluorescent pseudomonads. Phytopathology, 73 (3), 463–469.
Wen, J., Okyere, S.K., Wang, S., Wang, J., Xie, L., Ran, Y., & et al. (2022). Endophytic fungi: an effective alternative source of plant- derived bioactive compounds for pharmacological studies. Journal of Fungi, 8, 205.
Wen, Y., Li, M., Yang, S., Peng, L., Fan, C., & Kang, H. (2024). Isolation of antagonistic endophytic fungi from postharvest Chestnuts and their biocontrol on host fungal pathogens. Journal of Fungi, 10, 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080573
Wipat, A., & Harwood, C.R. (1999). The Bacillus subtilis genome sequence. The molecular blueprint of a soil bacterium. FEMS Microbiology and Ecology, 28, (1), 1-9.
Wong, P.T.W. (1994). Biocontrol of wheat Take-all in the field using soil bacteria and fungi. Pp: 24-28. In: Rder, M.H., P.M. Stephens and G.P. Bowen (Eds.), Improving Plant productivity with Rhizosphere bacteria, Adelaide, South Australia.
Xiang, L., Gong, S., Yang, L., Hao, J., Xue, M., Zhang, F., Shi, W., Wang, H., Yu, D. 2016. Biocontrol potential of endophytic fungi in medicinal plants from Wuhan botanical garden in China. Biological Control, 94, 47–55.
Xie J., Wu, Y.Y., Zhang, T.Y., Zhang, M.Y., Peng, F., Lin, B., & et al. (2018). New antimicrobial compounds produced by endophytic Penicillium janthinellum isolated from Panax notoginseng as potential inhibitors of FtsZ. Fitoterapia, 131, 35– 43.
Xu, W., Xu, L., Deng, X., Goodwin, P., Xia, M., et al. (2021). Biological control take-all and growth promotion in wheat by Pseudomonas chlororaphis YB-1. Pathogens, 10(7), 903. doi:10.3390/pathogens10070903
Yadav, A.N., Verma, P., Kumar, V., Sangwan, P., Mishra, S., Panjiar, N. et al. (2018) Chapter 1 – biodiversity of the genus Penicillium in different habitats. In: New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 3– 18.
Youn-Sig, K., Robert, F.B., Patricia, A.O., Timothy, C.P., Linda, S.T., & David, M.W. (2012).  Factors impacting the activity of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens against take-all of wheat. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 54, 48-56.
Yuan, H., Shi, B., Huang, T., Zhou, Z., Wang, L., Hou, H., & Tu, H. (2021). Biological control of pear valsa canker caused by Valsa pyri using Penicillium citrinumHorticulturae, 7, 198. http://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070198
   Yu, Y., Kang, Z., Buchenauer, H., & Huang, L. (2009). Purification and characterization of a novel extracellular ß-1, 3-glucanase complex (GluGgt) secreted by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. World Journal Microbiology and Biotechnology, 25 (12), 2179–2186.
Zakira Naureen, Adam, H. Price., Fauzia. Y. Hafeez., & Michael. R. Roberts. (2009). Identification of rice blast disease suppressing bacterial strains from the rhizosphere of rice grown in Pakistan. Crop Protection, 28, 1052-1060.
Zhang, Q.H., Zhang, J., Yang, L., Zhang, L., Jiang, D.H., Chen, W.D., & Li, G.Q. (2014). Diversity and biocontrol potential of endophytic fungi in Brassica napus. Biological Control, 72, 98–108.