مقایسۀ واکنش انواع بهاره و پاییزۀ ژنوتیپ‌های مختلف گندم نان ((Triticum aestivum در مقابل بیماری پاخورۀ گندم (Take-all disease)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی


1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی، دانشگاه ولی‌عصر(عج) رفسنجان، رفسنجان

2 دانشیار گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی، دانشگاه ولی‌عصر(عج) رفسنجان، رفسنجان

3 استادیار گروه گیاه‌پزشکی، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی، دانشگاه ولی‌عصر(عج) رفسنجان، رفسنجان

4 استاد گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرج، تهران


بیماری پاخوره گندم ناشی از قارچGaeumannomycs graminis var. tritici   از بیماری­های مهم گندم است که ریشه و طوقه را دچار آسیب می­کند. ارزیابی ژرم­پلاسم و شناسایی منابع مقاومت، اولین مرحله در تولید ارقام مقاوم به این بیماری است. در این بررسی 221 ژنوتیپ گندم نان، تهیه شده از نقاط مختلف ایران و خارج از کشور، در مقابل جدایه T-41 این قارچ مورد ارزیابی گلخانه­ای قرار گرفتند. صفات میزان آلودگی ریشه و طوقه (نمره بیماری)، وزن خشک بیولوژیک و ارتفاع در ژنوتیپ­های بهاره اندازه­گیری شد (از آنجایی که نیاز سرمایی ژنوتیپ­های پاییزه در گلخانه برطرف نشد، لذا ژنوتیپ­های بهاره به ساقه رفتند و ارتفاع فقط در ژنوتیپ­های بهاره اندازه­گیری شد). بر اساس میانگین نمره بیماری (Sc) ژنوتیپ­ها به 6 دسته تقسیم شدند، بر این اساس 4 ژنوتیپ کاملا مقاوم (Sc=.)، 42 ژنوتیپ مقاوم (1<Sc≤0)، 42 ژنوتیپ نیمه مقاوم (2<Sc≤1)، 70 ژنوتیپ نیمه حساس (3<Sc≤2)، 45 ژنوتیپ حساس (4<Sc≤3) و 18 ژنوتیپ کاملا حساس (5<Sc≤4) شناسایی شد. نتایج حاصل از تجزیه واریانس، رگرسیون لجستیک و کای اسکوئر به خوبی تنوع ژنتیکی موجود در جمعیت را از نظر مقاومت به بیماری و رابطه بین عکس­العمل به بیماری و نوع رشد نشان داد. انواع پاییزه، نسبت به بهاره مقاومت بیش­تری داشتند. همچنین با مقایسه تیمارهای شاهد با آلوده مشخص شد که احتمالاً این بیماری سیستم دفاعی گیاه را تحریک می­کند که منجر به رشد بیشتر تیمارهای آلوده نسبت به شاهد می­شود.


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison Between spring and autumn growth types of different wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes in response to Take-all disease

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mozhgan Gholizadeh Vazvani 1
  • Hossein Dashti 2
  • Roohallah Saberi Riseh 3
  • Mohammad Reza Bihamta 4
1 .Sc. Student, Department of Plant Breeding, University of Vali e Asr Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Breeding, University of Vali e Asr Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, University of vali e Asr Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
4 Professor, Department of Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Wheat take-all disease caused by the fungus Gaeumannomycs graminis var. tritici is an important diseases of wheat that damaged to root and crown. Evaluation of germplasm and identification of sources resistance is the first step for production of resistant varieties. In this study, 221 genotype of bread wheat, received from different location of Iran and other countries, were evaluated to take-all (T-41 isolate) in greenhouse conditions. The amount of root and crown pollution (disease score), biological dry weight and height of spring genotypes were measured (Due to the fact that winter genotypes verbalization's need didn’t meet, spring genotypes jointing and just in spring genotypes height had been measured). The genotypes were classified into six groups on the basis of mean scores. The groups are including; 4 genotypes were in highly resistant group (42 genotypes in resistant (0<Sc≤1), 42 in moderately resistant (1<Sc≤2), 70 genotypes in moderately sensitive (2<Sc≤3), 45 genotypes in sensitive (3<Sc≤4) and 18 genotypes in highly sensitive groups (4<Sc≤5). Analysis of variance, logistic regression and χ2 –square have showed a high genetic diversity to diseases resistance and its relationship with growth types (spring and winter) of wheat. Winter types were more resistant in response to take-all. The infected plants in compare to their control showed that this disease should stimulate the immune system of plants and consequently caused the more growth.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Resistance
  • germplasm
  • Logistic regression
  • Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici

    1. Bagheri, A., Yazdi Samadi, B., Taeb, M. & Ahmadi, M.R. (2001). A study of genetic diversity in Landrace populations of safflower in Iran. Iranian Journal Agriculrure Science, 32, 447-456. (in Farsi)
    2. Bailey, D. J., Kleczkowski, A. & Gilligan, C. A. (2006). An epidemiological analysis of the role of disease-induced root growth in the differential response of two cultivars of winter wheat to infection by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Phytopathology, 96, 510-516.
    3. Burnell, J. N. (1988). The biochemistry of manganese in plants, pp.125-137. IN: Manganese in Soils and Plants, (Graham, R. D. R.J. Hannam, R. J. & Uren, N. C (eds.)) Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
    4. Colbach, N., Lucas, P. & Meynard, J. M. (1997). Influence of crop management on take-all development and disease cycles on winter wheat. Phytopathology, 87, 26-32.
    5. Gorlach, Y., Volrath, S., Knauf, B., Eiter, G., Hengy, G., Beckhove, U., Kogel, K. H., Oostendorp, M., Staub, T., Ward, E. & Kessmann, H. (1996). Benzothiadiazole a novel class of inducers of systemic acquired resistance, activates gene expression and disease resistance in wheat. Plant and Cell, 8, 629-643.
    6. Habibi, M., Abiar Fini, A., Mirakhorli, N. & Mardi, M. (2013). Study of expression pattern of S-Like RNase gene to several Fungal disease in Bread Wheat. Crop Biotechnology, 5, 85-92. (in Farsi)                                                           
    7. Hornby, D. (1981). Inoculum. In: Asher MJ, Shipton PJ, eds. Biology and Control of Take-all. London: Academic Press, 271-94.                                                                  
    8. Huber, D. M. & McCay-Buis, T. S. (1993). A multiple component analysis of the take-all disease of cereals. Plant Disease, 77, 437-447.
    9. Julideh, F., Maarefat, A. & Naseri, B. (2011). Take-all diseases of wheat caused by the fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in wheat roots Zanjan and evaluate the inhibitory effect on the bacteria that causes fungus. Journal of Agricultural, 35. (in Farsi)
    10. Karov, I., Mitrev, S., Kavacevic, B. & Kostadinovska, E. (2008). Divercity of fungal pathogens infecting Hordeum L. in Macedonia, symptoms and morphology. Plant Protection Department, 1-13.
    11. Liatukas, Z., Ruzgas, V. & Razbadouskiene, K. (2010). Take-all resistance of Lithuanian winter wheat breeding lines. Agronomy Research, 3, 653-662.
    12. Mattson, B. (1973). Screening of varieties for resistance to the take-all fungus and the transference of resistance to Swedish material. Sveriges Utsades Forenings Tidskrift, 83, 281-297.
    13. Mc Cay Buis, T. S., Huber, D. M., Graham, R. D., Phillips, J. D. & Miskin, K. E. (1995). Manganese seed content and take‐all of cereals. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 18(8), 1711-1721.
    14. McMillan, V. E. (2012). Identification and characterization of resistance to the take-all fungus in wheat. Ph.D. Thesis. Biological Sciences England.
    15. Nasraoui, B., Hajlaoui, M. R., Gargouri, S. & Kremer, R. J. (2007). Luttebiologiquecontre le pietin- echaudage du ble: II- Criblagerapidepour la selection de bacteriessuppressives de Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici au laboratoire avec des essais de confirmation sous serreet au champ. Journal of Plant Protection, 2, 35-46.
    16. Nilsson, H. E. (1969). Studies of root and foot rot diseases of cereals and grasses. I. On resistance to Ophiobolus graminis Sacc. Lantbrukshogskolans Annaler, 35, 275-807.
    17. Omran Zadeh, F., Sahebani, N. A. & Aminian, H. A. (2011). Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activity in cucumber infected root knot-nematode Meloidogyne javanica by stimulus β-amino butyric acid (BABA). Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology Science, 2, 315-323. (in Farsi)
    18. Ownley, B. H., Duffy, B. K. & Weller, D. M. (2003). Identification and manipulation of soil properties to improve the biological control performance of phenazine-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 3333-3343.
    19. Oyanagi, A., Suenaga, K., Kawaguchi, K., Tsuyushige, M., Takada, H., Sato, A. & Eguchi, H. (1990). Varietal differences in resistance to take-all disease in wheat and barley. Bulletin of the National Agriculture Research Centre Japan, 18, 19-40.
    20. Penrose, L. D. J. (1987). Thickening and browning of cortical cell walls in seminal roots of wheat seedlings infected with Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Annals of Applied Biology, 110, 463-470.
    21. Radmehr, A. (2007-2008). Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. www.maj.ir. (in Farsi)
    22. Sadravi, M. (2008). Important Diseases of Crops. Publications SID Mashhad. (in Farsi)                                  
    23. Scott, P. R. (1981). Variation in host susceptibility. pp. 214-236. In: Asher, M.J.C., and Shipton, P.J. (ed.). Biology and Control of Take-all. Academic Press. London.
    24. Thomashow, L. S. & Weller, D. M. (1988). Role of a phenazine antibiotic from Pseudomonas fluorescens in biological control of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Journal of Bacteriology, 170, 3499-3508.                                                                          
    25. Wiese, M. V. (1987). Compendium of wheat disease. 2nd ed., APS Press.
    26. Yazdi Samadi, B., Rezaee, A. & Vali Zadeh, M. (2003). Statistical designs in agricultural research. Tehran. (in Farsi)
    27. Zare, L. & Fasihiani, A. (2008). Reaction of some Small Grain cereals to an Iranian Isolate of Take-all Fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis (Sacc.) var. tritici Walker. Journal of Plant Breeding and Seed, 1-25, 83-94. (in Farsi)