c3518cb17d976b8

بررسی رابطۀ صفات رویشی و مقاومت به بیماری پاخوره در گندم نان در شرایط گلخانه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج) رفسنجان

2 گروه گیاه پزشکی، دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج) رفسنجان

3 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج

چکیده

بیماری پاخورۀ گندم با عامل (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) یکی از بیماری­های زیانبار ریشۀ گندم در سراسر جهان است. تابه‌حال رقم مقاومی نسبت به این بیماری در ذخایر توارثی (ژرم­پلاسم) گندم نان معرفی نشده است. در این بررسی 416 ژنوتیپ گندم نان، تهیه‌شده از نقاط مختلف ایران و خارج از کشور، در برابر جدایۀ T-41 این قارچ ارزیابی گلخانه­ای شدند. وزن خشک ریشه، ساقه و کل زی‌توده (بیوماس)، ارتفاع، شاخص نشانه‌های بیماری، شدت بیماری، وزن دانه در خوشه و شمار دانه در خوشه اندازه­گیری شدند. تجزیۀ واریانس صفات نشانگر اختلاف بسیار معنی­دار بین ژنوتیپ­ها بود. ژنوتیپ­های پاییزه مقاوم­تر از بهاره­ها بودند. در بعضی از ژنوتیپ­ها نظام ریشه­ای تیمارهای آلوده به‌طور شایان‌توجهی گسترش یافته بود و ریشه‌های اضافی در رویارویی با بیماری ایجادشده­ و بعضی از ژنوتیپ‌های پاییزۀ آلوده در گلخانه بدون رفع نیاز سرمایی آن‌ها به خوشه رفتند. احتمال دارد قارچ عامل بیماری سبب بهاره­سازی بعضی از ژنوتیپ­های پاییزه شده و وزن خشک ریشه همبستگی منفی و معنی­داری ***510/0-=r) با شدت بیماری داشت. ژنوتیپ­ها بر پایۀ میانگین نمرۀ بیماری به شش گروه تقسیم شدند؛ بنابراین یازده ژنوتیپ در گروه کامل مقاوم، 59 ژنوتیپ در گروه مقاوم، 64 ژنوتیپ در گروه نیمه مقاوم، 105 ژنوتیپ در گروه نیمه حساس، 104 ژنوتیپ در گروه حساس و 73 ژنوتیپ در گروه کامل حساس قرار داده شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Study of relationship between of vegetative traits and resistance to take-all disease in greenhouse condition

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mozhgan Gholizadeh Vazvani 1
  • Hossein Dashti 1
  • Rooh Allah Saberi Riseh 2
  • Mohammad Reza Bihamta 3
1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Vali-e-Asr Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
2 Department of Plant Protection, University of Vali-e-Asr Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
3 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Take-all disease of wheat (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) (Ggt) is one of the most destructive root diseases in the world. It has not been introduced resistant genotype against this disease. In this study, 416 genotype of bread wheat, received from different location of Iran and other countries, were evaluated to take-all (T-41 isolate) in greenhouse conditions. Root dry weight, shoot dry weight, biological dry weight, amount of root and crown infection (disease score), disease index (DI), height, grain weight and number of seed were measured. Analysis of variance showed significantly different among genotypes. Winter genotypes are more resistant to take-all disease. Also in some genotypes, infected plants had root system more extensive and have produced additional roots and some infected genotypes of winter types were headed in the greenhouse without vernalization.  Probably, this fungus have vernalization effect on some winter wheat genotypes.  Root dry weight and disease index were and negatively correlated (-0.510***). The genotypes were classified into six groups on the basis of mean scores. The groups are; 11 genotypes were in highly resistant group (Sc = 0), 59 genotypes in resistant (0<Sc≤1), 64 in moderately resistant (1<Sc≤2), 105 genotypes in moderately sensitive (2<Sc≤3), 104 genotypes in sensitive (3<Sc≤4) and 73 genotypes in highly sensitive groups (4<Sc≤5).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • disease index
  • germplasm
  • Resistance
  • wheat take-all

مراجع

  1. Amini, J. (1996). The mycoflore study of wheat root in Tehran Province. M.Sc. thesis. Plant Pathology Agriculture Faculty, Tarbiat Modares Univercity, Iran. (in Farsi)
  2. Cook, R. J. (2003). Take-all of wheat. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 62, 73-86.
  3. Da-Hui, H., Zhi-Shad, L., Xiao, C., Zeng-Yan, Z., Cai-Ceng, C., Shun-He, C. & Zhe-Yang, X. (2007). Molecular characterization of Triticum durum-Haylandia viosa Amphiploid and its derivatives for resistance to Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Agricultural Sciences in China, 6(5), 513-521.
  4. Daval, S., Lebreton, L., Gazengel, K., Boutin, M., Guillerm-Erckelboudt, A. & Sarniguet, A. (2011). The biocontrol bacterium Pseudomonas flourescens PF29 Arp strain affects the pathogenesis- related gene expression of the take-all fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici on wheat roots. Molecular Plant Pathology, 12, 839-854.
  5. Durrant, W. E. & Dong, X. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance. Phytopathology, 42, 185-209.
  6. Elliott, M. L. & Landschoot, P. J. (1991). Fungi similar to Gaeumannomyces associated with root rot of turf grasses in Florida. Journal of Plant Diseases, 75, 238-241.
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2015). www.FAO.org.
  8. Fouly, H. M. & Wilkinson, H. T. (2000). Detection of Gaeumannomyces graminis Varieties Using Polymerase Chain Reaction with Variety-Specific Primers. Journal of Plant Diseases. 84: 947-51.
  9. Freeman, J. & Ward, E. (2004). Gaeumannomyces graminis the take-all fungus and its relative. Molecular Plant Pathology, 5(4), 235-252.
  10. Frootan, N.A., Bamdadian, A., Golzar, H., Daneshpajzooh, B. & Ebrahimi, S. (1989). The observation of take-all disease on wheat in Mazandaran Province. Abstracts of the 9th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, Ferdousi University of Mashhad, Iran, 9-14. (in Farsi)
  11. Ghalandar, M. (2001). Investigation on wheat take-all disease and its distribution in Markazi Province. The Center of Agricultural and Natural Researches. (in Farsi)
  12. Gholizadeh Vazvani, M., Dashti, H., Saberi Riseh, R. & Bihamta, M. R. (2015). Comparison between spring and autumn growth types of different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes in response to take-all disease. Iranian Journal of Plant Protection Science, 46(2), 307-316. (in Farsi)
  13. Guilleroux, M. & Osbourn, A. (2004). Gene expression during infection of wheat roots by the ‘take-all’ fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis. Molecular Plant Pathology, 5, 203-216.
  14. Gutteridge, R. J., Bateman, G. L. & Todd, A. D. (2003). Variation in the effects of take-all disease on grain yield and quality of winter cereals in field experiments. Pest Management Science, 59, 215-224. 
  15. Habibi, M., Abiar Fini, A., Mirakhorli, N. & Mardi, M. (2013). Study of expression pattern of S-Like RNase gene to several fungal diseases in Bread Wheat. Crop Biotechnology, 5, 85-92.
  16. Hornby, D. (1981). Inoculum. In: Asher, M. J. & Shipton, P. J., eds. Biology and Control of Take-all. London: Academic Press, 271-294.
  17. Hornby, D., Bateman, G.L. & Gutteridge, R.J. (1998). Take-all disease of cereals: A regional perspective. CAB International.
  18. Liatukas, Z., Ruzgas, V. & Razbadu Skiene, K. (2010). Take-all resistance of Litvanian winter wheat breeding lines. Agronomy Research, 3,653-662.
  19. Liu, X., Yang, L., Zhou, X., Zhou, M., Lu, Y., Ma, L., Ma, H. & Zhang, Z. (2013). Transgenic wheat expressing Thinopyrum intermedium MYB transcription factor TiMYB2R-1 shows enhanced resistance to the take-all disease. Journal of Experimental Botany, 8, 2243-2253.
  20. Mattsson, B. (1973). Screening of varieties for resistance to the take-all fungus and the transference of resistance to Swedish material. Sveriges Utsades Forenings Tidskrift, 83, 281-297.
  21. Mc Cay Buis, T. S., Huber, D. M., Graham, R. D., Phillips, J. D. & Miskin, K. E. (1995). Manganese seed content and take‐all of cereals. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 18(8), 1711-1721.
  22. McMillan, V. E. (2012), Identification and characterization of resistance to the take-all fungus in wheat. Ph. D. Thesis. Biological Sciences, University of Exeter. England.
  23. McMillan, V.E., Gutteridge, R.J. & Hammond-Kosack, K.E. (2014). Identification variation in resistance to the take-all fungus, Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici between different ancestral and modern wheat sepsis. BMC Plant Biology, 14, 212.
  24. Nilsson, H. E. (1969). Studies of root and foot rot diseases of cereals and grasses: I. On resistance to Ophiobolus graminis. Annuals of the Agricultural College of Sweden, 35, 275-807.
  25. Omran Zadeh, F., Sahebani, N.A. & Aminian, H.A. (2011). Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activity in cucumber infected root knot-nematode Meloidogyne javanica by stimulus β-amino butyric acid (BABA). Iranian journal of plant pathology science, 2, 315-323. (in Farsi)  
  26. Ownley, B.H., Duffy, B.K. & Weller, D.M. (2003). Identification and manipulation of soil properties to improve the biological control performance of phenazine-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 3333-3343.
  27. Penrose, L. D. J. (1987). Thickening and browning of cortical cell walls in seminal roots of wheat seedlings infected with Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Annals of Applied Biology, 110, 463-470.
  28. Rachdowang, S. (1999). PCR-Based test for differentiating varietes of Gaeumannomyces graminis, the take-all pathogens. Ph. D. Thesis. Virginia polytechnic Institute and State University. 184pp.
  29. Thomashow, L. S. & Weller, D. M. (1988). Role of a phenazine antibiotic from Pseudomonas fluorescens in biological control of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Journal of Bacteriology, 170, 3499-3508.
  30. Zafari, D., Mehrabi, M., Koushki, A. & Bazgir, E. (2008). Biocontrol evaluation of wheat take-all disease by Trichoderma screened isolates. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(20), 3653-3659.
  31. Zare, L. & Fasihiani, A. (2008). Reaction of some small grain cereals to an Iranian isolate of take-all fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis (Sacc.) var. tritici Walker. Journal of Plant Breeding and Seed, 1(25), 83-94. (in Farsi)
دانش گیاهپزشکی ایران
دوره 47، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 1
بهار و تابستان 1395
صفحه 11-20

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 11 شهریور 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 06 فروردین 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 اردیبهشت 1395

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار