c3518cb17d976b8

ارزیابی مزرعه‌ای واکنش فامیل‌های نیمه خواهری چغندرقند به بیماری سفیدک سطحی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 محقق، مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج

2 دانشیار پژوهش، مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج

3 استادیار پژوهش، مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج

چکیده

در این تحقیق، واکنش 138 ژنوتیپ چغندرقند شامل 127 فامیل نیمه خواهری (HSF) و 11 جمعیت والدینی آن‌ها به همراه دو شاهد مقاوم و حساس نسبت به بیماری سفیدک سطحی ناشی از قارچ  Weltzien Vanha)) Erysiphe betaeدر شرایط مزرعه در ایستگاه تحقیقات چغندرقند مهندس مطهری کرج در سال 1392تعیین شد. بر پایۀ روند شدت آلودگی در30 مرداد، شمار 22 ژنوتیپ به‌عنوان ژنوتیپ‌های مقاوم (با شدت آلودگی کمتر از 5/2) شناسایی شدند. در این میان، فامیل‌های HSF-850، HSF-848 و HSF-853به ترتیب با شدت آلودگی 1، 2/1 و 3/1 به‌عنوان مقاوم‌ترین فامیل‌ها بودند. تجزیۀ رگرسیون نشان داد، با افزایش شدت بیماری، عملکرد شکر سفید و عیار قند کاهش می‌یابد. با انجام تجزیۀ خوشه‌ای، جمعیت‌های والدینی اولیه و فامیل‌های به‌دست‌آمده به 7 گروه تقسیم شدند. در این میان، اغلب ژنوتیپ‌های متحمل/مقاوم در گروه 5 قرار گرفتند که می‌توان از آن‌ها برای انتقال مقاومت بهره گرفت. در گروه 2،  ژنوتیپ‌های HSF-584، HSF-582، HSF-557، HSF-551، HSF-866، HSF-844، HSF-670، HSF-556، HSF-628، HSF–610، HSF-564، HSF-685،HSF–619، HSF–664و HSF-558قرار داشتند که وضعیت بسیار مطلوب از نظر عملکرد ریشه، عملکرد شکر سفید، درصد قند قابل استحصال و عیار قند داشتند. لذا می‌توان از این فامیل‌ها به‌عنوان والد گرده‌افشان برای تهیۀ رقم‌های هیبرید (دورگ) استفاده کرد یا در چرخۀ بعدی گزینش، از آن‌ها فامیل‌های نیمه خواهری یا تمام خواهری جدید تهیه کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Field evaluation of sugar beet half-sib families’ reaction to powdery mildew

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elham Moaven 1
  • Abazar Rajabi 2
  • Mohsen Aghaizadeh 3
1 Researcher, Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this research, the reaction of 138 sugar beet half-sib families and their 11 parental populations to powdery mildew (Erysiphe betae Weltzien Vanha) was studied in a randomized complete block design with three replications at Motahari Research Station, Karaj, Iran in 2013. A linear scale of 0-9 was used for disease rating. On the basis of disease scoring conducted in 10th September, 22 genotypes with a score lower than 2.5 were found to be disease resistant. The families HSF-850, HSF-853, and HSF-848 with the disease score of 1, 1.2, and 1.3, respectively, were the most resistant families. Regression analysis showed that white sugar yield and sugar content were decreased by increasing the disease. Cluster analysis classified the initial populations as well as their half-sib families into 7 groups. Among these, most of the tolerant/resistant genotypes were clustered in the group 5 which could be used for resistance transfer. The cluster 2 included the genotypes HSF-584, HSF-582, HSF-557, HSF-551, HSF-866, HSF-844, HSF-670, HSF-556, HSF-628, HSF–610, HSF-564, HSF-685, HSF–619, HSF–664, and HSF-558 which were considered as families with optimum root yield, white sugar yield, white sugar content and sugar content. Therefore, these families could be used as pollinator parents to develop hybrid varieties or they can be exploited in the next cycle of family selection to develop new half-sib or full-sib families.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Erysiphe betae
  • genotype
  • loss
  • Resistance
  • Variety

مراجع

  1. Abdollahian Noghabi, M., Shekholeslami, R. & Babaei, B. (2005). Terms and definitions of yield and technological quality o sugarbeet. Journal of Sugar Beet, 21(1), 101-104.
  2. Abrinbana, M., Babai-Ahary, A. & Majidi Heravan, I. )2007(. Assessment of resistance in sugarbeet lines to damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum Trow var. ultimum under greenhouse conditions. Plant Pathology Journal, 6, 266-270.
  3. Asher, M. (2002). Disease in 2001and their control. British Sugar Beet Review, 70, 30-33.
  4. Asher, M. & Williams, G. (1992). Controlling leaf disease: powdery mildew. British Sugar Beet Review, 60, 35-37.
  5. Asher, M. J. C., Luterbacher, M. C. & Frese, L. (2001). Wild Beta species as a source of resistance to sugar-beet pests and diseases. In: Comptes-Rendus des congres de l'institut international de recherches betteravieres (Belgium).‏
  6. Basati, J., Zareii, J., Zarrabi, M. R. & Fazli, H. (2003). Effect of powdery mildew disease on quantity and quality of sugare beet yield in Kermanshah province. Journal of Sugar Beet, 19, 97-108. (in Farsi with English abstract).
  7. Basati, J., Mesbah, M., Karimzadeh, Gh. & Sadeghian, S. Y. (2005). Analysis of genetic resistance to powdery mildew disease in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet, 21(2), 105-122. (in Farsi with English abstract)
  8. Basati, J. & Roshani, Kh. (2006). Investigation of tolerance in commercial variety of sugar beet to powdery mildew disease. Final Report. (in Farsi with English abstract)
  9. Basati, J., Sheikholeslami, M., Babai, B. & Roshani, Kh.( 2009). Investigation of tolerance in commercial variety of sugar beet to powdery mildew disease. Final Report. (in Farsi with English Abstract)
  10. Basati, J., Sheikholeslami, M., Jalilian, A., Nemati, A. & Khodai, A. H. (2013). Development of diploid pollinator for resistance to powdery mildew disease in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet, 29(1), 1-13. (in Farsi with English Abstract)
  11. Gado, E. A. M. (2013). Impact of treatment with some plant extracts and fungicides on sugar beet   powdery mildew and yield components.  Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 468-472
  12. Grimmer, M. K., Bean, K. M. R. & Asher, M. J. C. (2007). Mapping of five resistance genes to sugar-beet powdery mildew using AFLP and anchored SNP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 115, 67-75.
  13. Janssen, G. J. W., Nihlgard, M. & Kraft, T. ( 2003). Mapping of resistance genes to powdery mildew (Erysiphe betae) in sugar beet. 1st Joint IIRB-ASSBT Congress, 26th Feb -1st March 2003, San Antonio, USA.
  14. Kontradowitz, L. & Verreet, J. A. (2010). Assessment of resistance and virulence in the pathosystem sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)/powdery mildew (Erysiphe betae)-development of basics for an effective powdery mildew resistance breeding. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 117(2), 49-54.‏
  15. Lewellen, R. T. & Schrandet, J. K. ( 2001). Inheritance of powdery mildew resistance in sugar beet   derived from Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima. Plant Disease, 85, 627-631.
  16. Liatucas, Z. & Ruzgas, V. (2008). Powdery mildew resistance of winter wheat cultivars registered in Lithuania. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 95, 327-335.
  17. Luterbacher, M. C., Asher, J. M., Asher, M. J. C. & Frees, L. (2000). Disease resistance in collection of Beta species. Sugar Beet Research, 37, 39-47.
  18. Luterbacher, M. C., Asher, M. J. C., DeAmbrogio, E., Biancardi, E., Stevenato, P. & Frese, L. (2004). Sources of resistance to diseases of sugar beet in related Beta germplasm: I. Foliar diseases. Euphytica, 139, 105-121.
  19. Marchesan, C. B., Melo, A. M. & Paterniani, M. E. A. (2009). Combining ability in sweet pepper for   resistance to powdery mildew. Horticultura Brasileira, 27(2), 189-195.
  20. Oliver, T. N. & Gallian, J. J. (2013). Powdery mildew on sugar beet: importance, identification, and control. Pacific North-West Extension Publication, 1-5, p. 4.
  21. Reinefeld, E., Emmerich, A., Baumgarten, G., Winner, C. & Beiss, U. (1974). Zur voraussage des melassezuckers aus rubenanalysen. Zucker, 27, 2-15.
  22. Sheikholeslami, M. (2005). Genetic diversity of Iranian Isolates of sugar beet powdery mildew in Iran. Ph. D. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, Tehran University. (in Farsi with English Abstract)
  23. Sheikholeslami, M. & Basati, J. (1998). Preliminary study on the selection of resistant sources of the    genus Beta resistant to powdery mildew in sugar beet. Final Report. (in Farsi with English Abstract)
  24. Taleghani, D. F., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S. & Mesbah, M. (2010). Strategic framework for sugar beet research. Publication of Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Karaj, Iran. 520 pp.
  25. Ćurčić, Ž., Nagl, N., Taški-Ajduković, K., Danojević, D., Stojaković, Ž. & Kovačev, L. (2013). Genetic diversity and combining abilities for root traits of sugar beet pollinators. Genetika, 45(2), 361-368.‏
  26. Weltzien, H. C. (1963). Erysiphe betae (vanha), the powdery mildew of beets. Phytopathology.
    47, 123-123.
  27. Whitney, E. D. (1989). Beta maritima as a source of powdery mildew resistance in sugar beet. Plant Disease, 73, 487-489.
  28. Whitney, E. D., Lewellen, R. T. & Skoyen, I. O. (1983). Reaction of sugar beet to powdery mildew: genetic variation, association among testing procedure and resistance breeding. Phytopathology, 73, 183-185.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 07 دی 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 11 دی 1396
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 01 اسفند 1396
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 اسفند 1396

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار